Iran

#10,680
#10,680
OrangeTsar said:
Oh I have plenty of technical knowledge. I’ve got the certifications to prove it. Heavy jamming around Tehran but they don’t have enough jammers to cover the whole country. And even where it is being jammed; there is between a 30 to 80% packet loss. Which means 20 to 70 percent of packets get through. And under the TCP/IP protocol; dropped packets get resent until confirmed. This means that access is slowed dramatically but still can get through. No 4K streaming video usually but text and news will trickle through. Same as when your cellphone is showing 1 or 2 bars.
I used to teach computer networking for ITT FWIW
Click to expand...

Lol given what you garbled out from wikipedia I'd wholly believe that you used to teach at ITT tech.

Go look up packet-loss usability rates for Starlink since you forgot to do so before you typed that out as if Starlink is still usable with 80% packet loss.

I look forward to you putting that ITT know-how to use in your response.
 
#10,684
#10,684
Associated Press journalists in Beirut were jolted awake by a series of loud explosions that shook buildings and caused windows to shatter, while war planes could be heard low overhead as Israel launched a series of strikes in retaliation for missiles fired across the border by the Lebanese militant group Hezbollah.

Lebanese government officials had urged Hezbollah not to enter the fray in support of Iran, fearing another damaging war.

The country has not recovered from the last Israel-Hezbollah war, which nominally ended with a U.S.-brokered ceasefire in November 2024.

Israel has continued to launch near-daily strikes in Lebanon since then, which it said aim to stop Hezbollah from regrouping.

Lebanese Prime Minister Nawaf Salam in a statement following the strikes said, “We will not allow the country to be dragged into new adventures, and we will take all necessary measures to apprehend those responsible and protect the Lebanese people.”

 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary and 85SugarVol
#10,685
#10,685
Last edited:
#10,694
#10,694
ButchPlz said:
Did you read all of the posts, or only certain ones? Because if we're going to admit there is enormous bureaucratic waste in the military, then some of that waste by default has to be in "human capital".

There are many "Veterns" that are doing useless work. If you want to argue that that is not true, then we're not even at a reasonable starting point.
Click to expand...
No, I read all of your posts from yesterday to today, I didn’t comment on any of the ones that challenged your supposed ‘anti Jewish’ remarks even though I’m part Jewish, nor will I because I don’t want to research them nor do I lay in the PF much at all, but wanted to see how VN felt about all this. I was merely stating how your posts read to a veteran reading them, maybe go back and read your own posts through the eyes of a veteran that never signed up for just a job training and benefits.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TN-POSSUM, InVOLuntary, DuckInAPen and 5 others
#10,695
#10,695
ButchPlz said:
You know this immigration crap all started with Reagan's big old amnesty, right? 20 years is not nearly the correct timeline.
Click to expand...
With that deal, Democrats promised to support stricter border control which never occurred in Congress. Probably the start of the distrust of the democrat party by the GOP to lead us to where we are today.
 
#10,696
#10,696
MAD said:
Show proof
Click to expand...
He’s not going to show a credible source …. Because it’s a half lie ….again

The story comes from Haffa where there’s only 35%ish of shelters for the people of that area. So there were a lot of people turned away, not because they were Arabs but because they were full. Lots of Jews turned away too.
An investigation revealed that there was no proof of preference in the shelters. Who got there first was let in.
CNN covered this on several of their programs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeburst, TN-POSSUM, InVOLuntary and 6 others
#10,697
#10,697
Orangeslice13 said:
He’s not going to show a credible source …. Because it’s a half lie ….again

The story comes from Haffa where there’s only 35%ish of shelters for the people of that area. So there were a lot of people turned away, not because they were Arabs but because they were full. Lots of Jews turned away too.
An investigation revealed that there was no proof of preference in the shelters. Who got there first was let in.
CNN covered this on several of their programs.
Click to expand...
pretends to be shocked 🫢
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeslice13
#10,699
#10,699
Orangeslice13 said:
He’s not going to show a credible source …. Because it’s a half lie ….again

The story comes from Haffa where there’s only 35%ish of shelters for the people of that area. So there were a lot of people turned away, not because they were Arabs but because they were full. Lots of Jews turned away too.
An investigation revealed that there was no proof of preference in the shelters. Who got there first was let in.
CNN covered this on several of their programs.
Click to expand...
Sorry to disappoint you. What's a half lie that I've told?
 
New Posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

Advertisement



Back
Top