Iran

[OrangeTsar]

Ahh yes it has nothing to do with Nuclear weapons like Trump said. Okie

Britain entered the war against Germany in 1939. in 1943, intelligence indicated that Germany was attempting to build an atomic bomb. In response, British and Norwegian commandos launched a raid on a heavy water plant in Norway to destroy a vital component of the effort.
WWII didn’t have anything to do with Nuclear weapons, until it did.
We have been at war with the Iranian mullahs for over 40 years. We have every reason to keep them from increasing their power to destroy.

 

[OrangeTsar]

Is killing American military members grounds for war? Not being sarcastic here.

Yes.

 

[OrangeTsar]

Wait until you find out who killed the last Tsar.. It led to famine and the deaths of millions of Christians.

Mick Jager?

 

[Govolsman98]

Is killing American military members grounds for war? Not being sarcastic here.

If so we should've gone to war with Israel back in the 60s

 

[ButchPlz]

Yes.

Well, then, may want to give a look at history in the year 1967.

 

[adam.vol]

Mick Jager?

I have no sympathy for you type.

 

[hndog609]

Ahh yes it has nothing to do with Nuclear weapons like Trump said. Okie

Setting aside the veracity of any part of it (you two can go on with that) the observation that this particular strike being about nuclear weapons (what you said) isn't particularly problematic with what he said about us being in a long state of low level war posture. Seriously, even if just for the sake of taking OT's argument as face value why wouldn't you consider the possibility of a country you're at war with gaining nuclear weapon capability an extreme threat?

And again I'm backing nothing here other than how the argument itself being couched by OT need not be contradictory.

 

[RockyTop140]

I don't think we'll have troops in Iran, it would be political suicide for the Rs.

I hope not. But if the goal is regime change, I don’t know how you can truly accomplish that without boots on the ground.

 

[RDU VOL#14]

If people want to criticize Trump for this “war” or whatever this ends up being, that’s well within their right and I get it. At the same time don’t be a hypocrite and give others a pass. Obama put a drone strike kill mission on an American citizen, and then 2 weeks later killed his 16 year old son, born in Denver, while he was at a coffee shop. Not exactly due process for an American citizen

 

[lawgator1]

I’d expect them to improve their defense systems when it couldn’t stop a fly last summer. They received s400’s from Russia in 2024 which obviously did not help. We should learn to stop starting wars off assumptions with no evidence

I don't disagree, but fact is we do not not have nearly a complete picture of what our decision-makers had to work with. I am willing to wait for that.

 

[85SugarVol]

There is innocent naive ignorance and there is malignant, deliberate, and demonic ignorance. I fear you have fallen into the later category.
Repent while there is still time.

It’s a paraphrase of this -

understand that Zionists are in fact the lead terrorists in the world and have sponsored everything from slavery, sex trafficking, the Holocaust, Islam, and Communism.

 

[hog88]

They love to leave out the part where Saddam intentionally mislead people into believing he had WMD too

And nobody questions where Assad got the chemical weapons he used on his own people.

 

[KB5252]

Too good to not repost. This thread needs a little levity

View attachment 817543

Hilarious

 

[Smokey123]

Britain entered the war against Germany in 1939. in 1943, intelligence indicated that Germany was attempting to build an atomic bomb. In response, British and Norwegian commandos launched a raid on a heavy water plant in Norway to destroy a vital component of the effort.
WWII didn’t have anything to do with Nuclear weapons, until it did.
We have been at war with the Iranian mullahs for over 40 years. We have every reason to keep them from increasing their power to destroy.

WW2 is irrelevant. Intelligence has repeatedly said Iran is not working towards a nuclear weapons

At best you can call it a proxy war. If every time a proxy killed someone meant it was an active war the US would be at fault for starting ALOT of wars

 

[Smokey123]

And nobody questions where Assad got the chemical weapons he used on his own people.

It traces back to the 70’s from soviets and Egypt

 

[hog88]

I hope not. But if the goal is regime change, I don’t know how you can truly accomplish that without boots on the ground.

My hope is that it comes internally.

 

[Volbucky]

Intelligence has repeatedly said Iran is not working towards a nuclear

What’s your clearance level?

 

[McDad]

We’re fine with nuclear powered terrorist states as long as they bank with Israel.

View attachment 817558

From wikipedia:
Most conspiracy theories about the Rothschild family arise from antisemitic prejudice and various antisemitic tropes.[

 

[OHvol40]

This is somewhat flawed as the Intel for WMD's dated back to at least the Clinton administration, Sadaam famously told his interviewer he made up and perpetuated that WMD program as a means to keep his enemies in Iran and elsewhere in check and insecure about escalating hostilities toward Iraq.

What is flawed?

 

[hog88]

It traces back to the 70’s from soviets and Egypt

The shelf life for that stuff is not 50+ years.

 

[MAD]

Setting aside the veracity of any part of it (you two can go on with that) the observation that this particular strike being about nuclear weapons (what you said) isn't particularly problematic with what he said about us being in a long state of low level war posture. Seriously, even if just for the sake of taking OT's argument as face value why wouldn't you consider the possibility of a country you're at war with gaining nuclear weapon capability an extreme threat?

And again I'm backing nothing here other than how the argument itself being couched by OT need not be contradictory.

When they say Death to America, believe them.

 

[adam.vol]

From wikipedia:
Most conspiracy theories about the Rothschild family arise from antisemitic prejudice and various antisemitic tropes.[

Probably. I’m Semitic, so maybe it’s a you problem?

 

[McDad]

Probably. I’m Semitic, so maybe it’s a you problem?

Highly improbable since I am not posting Rothschild Conspiracy tropes.

 

[CobbVol]

They love to leave out the part where Saddam intentionally mislead people into believing he had WMD too

Sadaam used WMDs on his own people.

 

[n_huffhines]

From wikipedia:
Most conspiracy theories about the Rothschild family arise from antisemitic prejudice and various antisemitic tropes.[

Banking conspiracies are also unconvincing. Even when they're completely proven, like the Jekyll Island meetings, it doesn't really move the needle.

The banking conspiracies do not lend to the credibility of the don't make us pay for Israeli war crimes movement.