Iran

#23,576
#23,576
LouderVol said:
not that I expect it at all, but I would be interested to see your friends response to these issues. would also be interested in where his view point comes from, if he is selling something its going to push his view certain ways.
Click to expand...
I can't really expound on much more, but i will assure you that he/she doesn't have an agenda. I can't say anything that would be compromising.

My understanding is that the combination of extremely unstable leadership hell bent on killing infidels and progress towards nuclear capability and ICBM development is the driving factor.
 
#23,577
#23,577
"The Trump administration wants automakers and other American manufacturers to play a larger role in weapons production, reminiscent of a practice used during World War II.

Senior defense officials have held talks about producing weapons and other military supplies with the top executives of several companies, including Mary Barra of General Motors and Jim Farley of Ford Motor, according to people familiar with the discussions.

The Pentagon is interested in enlisting the companies to use their personnel and factory capacity to increase production of munitions and other equipment as the wars in Ukraine and Iran deplete stocks."


 
#23,578
#23,578
Let me clarify:

There are a select few countries with nuclear weapons that I would consider hostile or potentially-hostile towards the U.S. (Russia, China, NK). However, the two with ICBM capability to get a warhead here are not motivated to do so. NK would concern me more, of those three, especially if their missile program advances.

Iran's regime is honestly MORE hostile (due to Islamic extremist beliefs) and less predictable than Kim Jong. It is a known supporter and financial backer of anti-western terrorism. They have absolutely been seeking nuclear capability, although none of us know exactly how close they are/were. They do not currently have missiles capable of reaching us, but 1) they have the ability to strike nearby allies of the U.S. and our bases, 2) there are other means of sending a warhead overseas, and 3) there are other ways of inflicting casualties or other damages with non-nuclear terrorist attacks.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ETV and StarRaider
#23,579
#23,579
kiddiedoc said:
I can't really expound on much more, but i will assure you that he/she doesn't have an agenda. I can't say anything that would be compromising.

My understanding is that the combination of extremely unstable leadership hell bent on killing infidels and progress towards nuclear capability and ICBM development is the driving factor.
Click to expand...
Hell bent on killing infidels? How’s that? Their ties with Russia and China indicate otherwise. Is your friend John Bolton?
 
#23,581
#23,581
kiddiedoc said:
Let me clarify:

There are a select few countries with nuclear weapons that I would consider hostile or potentially-hostile towards the U.S. (Russia, China, NK). However, the two with ICBM capability to get a warhead here are not motivated to do so. NK would concern me more, of those three, especially if their missile program advances.

Iran's regime is honestly MORE hostile (due to Islamic extremist beliefs) and less predictable than Kim Jong. It is a known supporter and financial backer of anti-western terrorism. They have absolutely been seeking nuclear capability, although none of us know exactly how close they are/were. They do not currently have missiles capable of reaching us, but 1) they have the ability to strike nearby allies of the U.S. and our bases, 2) there are other means of sending a warhead overseas, and 3) there are other ways of inflicting casualties or other damages with non-nuclear terrorist attacks.
Click to expand...
You just sound like a Trump boot licker.... is that how it goes libs? Yeah, the establishment is fine with Iran getting nukes. The establishment is only concerned about taking power from their citizens. Trump is changing it and the globalist hated
 
#23,582
#23,582
volfanhill said:
"The Trump administration wants automakers and other American manufacturers to play a larger role in weapons production, reminiscent of a practice used during World War II.

Senior defense officials have held talks about producing weapons and other military supplies with the top executives of several companies, including Mary Barra of General Motors and Jim Farley of Ford Motor, according to people familiar with the discussions.

The Pentagon is interested in enlisting the companies to use their personnel and factory capacity to increase production of munitions and other equipment as the wars in Ukraine and Iran deplete stocks."


Click to expand...
I'm for it. I'd love to buy a tank right off the Airport Motor Mile in Alcoa.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider
#23,584
#23,584
trout-vol said:
You just sound like a Trump boot licker.... is that how it goes libs? Yeah, the establishment is fine with Iran getting nukes. The establishment is only concerned about taking power from their citizens. Trump is changing it and the globalist hated
Click to expand...
I'm sorry, not following
 
#23,585
#23,585
kiddiedoc said:
Let me clarify:

There are a select few countries with nuclear weapons that I would consider hostile or potentially-hostile towards the U.S. (Russia, China, NK). However, the two with ICBM capability to get a warhead here are not motivated to do so. NK would concern me more, of those three, especially if their missile program advances.

Iran's regime is honestly MORE hostile (due to Islamic extremist beliefs) and less predictable than Kim Jong. It is a known supporter and financial backer of anti-western terrorism. They have absolutely been seeking nuclear capability, although none of us know exactly how close they are/were. They do not currently have missiles capable of reaching us, but 1) they have the ability to strike nearby allies of the U.S. and our bases, 2) there are other means of sending a warhead overseas, and 3) there are other ways of inflicting casualties or other damages with non-nuclear terrorist attacks.
Click to expand...
 
New Posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

Advertisement



Back
Top