OCIVol
the.oci.vol@gmail.com
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2010
- Messages
- 8,146
- Likes
- 190
The Great Uniform Debate | Wogan on Sports
Hey guys a little off topic, just wanted to hear some opinions!
These uniforms are awful, however im a huge advocate for the orange helmet, dont change the uniform at all, simply just have the orange helmet for maybe 1 game this year, Still the school colors ORANGE and WHITE (not black, the black jersey is overdone and not a school color) just an inverted color scheme.
Would absolutely love to see the Vols in the GA Dome against NC state wearing
-This orange helmet w/ White Power T
-Traditional White Away Jersey (since we are the visiting team)
-Orange pants that we have been wearing on the road recently.
Basically the opposite of the home jersey scheme, white helmet & orange power T, orange jersey, white pants.
I think this would look really sharp and be only a minor change to the uniform, nothing radical IMO.
what do yall think, love to hear!
Go Big Orange!
Why do these posts always turn out to be Fulmer bashing...he's gone, get over it quit blaming everything on him.... Let's get excited and move foward and quit looking back trying to find someone or something to blame.
anyway, I was encouraged. He finally set some of expectations.
I wish Mike Hamilton would do an interview and disclose who was willing to take the UT job when he hired Dooley. Given how bad our roster was, I imagine the list would be short and unimpressive.
The flashy skill position players sell tickets. The big uglies up front win championships.
The best season I ever had was when I had some highly skilled big guys with nasty attitudes on both sides of the ball combined with average to decent skill players.
Too bad having awesome players in both areas is a rare occurrence.
We hear this one all the time. I wish someone would explain how this attempt at a rationalization should have any bearing on analyzing Dooley's performance. Do we just accept everything as it is, wring our hands, and repeatedly sob that no one else would have us like we were lepers? You think UT was/is a crappy place that no good coach would want to come to. I get that, but I don't agree with that. Even if it were true that he's the only coach in America that would take the job, I don't care. It's irrelevant. His performance is still able to be discussed.
The Little Orphan Annie attitude of no one loves us is an admission that you think UT is not an attractive place. You can have that negative outlook towards UT; I'm not going to have it. Talk about negavols....
The fact that Dooley was the only coach to accept the position that was approached about it is anything but a rationalization for the last two years; its merely an illustration of just how bad the situation must have been for so many (just) decent coaches to turn down an opportunity to coach at a top 10-15 coaching job in the NCAA.
We hear this one all the time. I wish someone would explain how this attempt at a rationalization should have any bearing on analyzing Dooley's performance. Do we just accept everything as it is, wring our hands, and repeatedly sob that no one else would have us like we were lepers? You think UT was/is a crappy place that no good coach would want to come to. I get that, but I don't agree with that. Even if it were true that he's the only coach in America that would take the job, I don't care. It's irrelevant. His performance is still able to be discussed.
The Little Orphan Annie attitude of no one loves us is an admission that you think UT is not an attractive place. You can have that negative outlook towards UT; I'm not going to have it. Talk about negavols....
Because two of the three recruiting classes in question here are on him. Fultard got lazy and it ran the program into the ground.Why do these posts always turn out to be Fulmer bashing...he's gone, get over it quit blaming everything on him. It's sounds like Obama blaming Bush for everything.
Part of the problem was the coaching turnover and the loss of players through attrition. The scholarship limits slowed down the rebuilding process as well. Now Dooley finally has 85 scholarship players and a much improved defensive coaching staff. Let's get excited and move foward and quit looking back trying to find someone or something to blame.
Can't wait for the fall! Go Vols!
So we have to be ok with settling for the only guy that said ok?
That's BS to me.
I must has misse his comment about Dooleys performance that you are going on about.
WHO SAID THAT???
I wasn't ok with the hiring of Dooley, I just presented one reason WHY he was ever considered for the job.
I wish Mike Hamilton would do an interview and disclose who was willing to take the UT job when he hired Dooley. Given how bad our roster was, I imagine the list would be short and unimpressive.
Dooley will be fine
Yeah...I'm still trying to figure that one out myself...and the fact that he apparently thinks I thought it was ok to take the first guy that said yes to the job.
I wasn't being confrontational. I was just presenting my side. I realize why he was considered. Part of that was MH is an idiot, imo. However, that still doesn't mean you just throw your hands up and accept it.
I'm not calling for Dooley's head immediately. Can he get it done? Possibly. I just don't think he will. Just not much of a fan of the "who else would have us" attitude. It's not the attitude of a winner, imo.
