The Dude
Abides.
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2007
- Messages
- 7,263
- Likes
- 8
I suppose it is always possible that you are right and the rest of the world is wrong. If you aren't aware that UT is well-known for its lack of player development, you are living in a cave. I have no need to provide any more examples.
I think that is overstating things just a little.
:lolabove: I thought caves were so much darker!
Maybe you can provide a link or legitimate resourse where you read UT "is well-known for it's lack of player development", or are you just going by word of mouth or message board haters?
I have no need to prove something that I already know.
Your inability to comprehend what I and others have been saying is astounding. It would be different if anyone had posted something that indicated that UT isn't well-known for poor development. On the contrary, everyone has posted the opposite.
I guess your idea for well known is this board. I'm talking nationally not a dern message board.
Again, can you please back up how UT is well-known for their lack of player development? Let's go with well-known in the general concept of things, which is outside this message board.
I suppose well-known might actually be a bit of a stretch. I should have said well-known amongst those who follow UT football. I think I recall Mel Kiper saying something about UT not developing players. I've heard it mentioned somewhere in NFL evaluations. I have no idea how to begin to research something like that. I imagine it would require resources to which I do not have access.
One place to start is to see how many 5 star players ended up being bust at UT compared to that of other schools. Someone did this recently on Rivals and found virtually no difference between UT and other SEC schools. I strongly disagree that UT has a reputation for not developing players. If anything, they argue this as a strength and have a pretty good argument when they are 2nd in the nation of putting players in the NFL.
I think the number of busts is more of a way to evaluate how well UT selects its recruits. If we have a high number of busts, then we probably aren't picking good guys to go after.
I really wish we could pick automatic qualifiers instead of "hoping" a kid can get his grades up to play. I know some are borderline, but some have been wasted scholarship offers.
If we have a lot of five star guys that are
average at best during their college career, then our player development probably isn't where it needs to be.
But you would be relying on the star system and that wouldn't be a fair way to judge their development. Some players don't deserve 5 stars in hindsight. Others are much better than the 2 star players we thought they'd be.
I consider a bust a guy like Morley that wouldn't have been great no matter what school he attended.
I don't agree with that. For a guy to be considered a "bust" he would have to be a highly touted recruit to begin with.....which in most cases means the UF's, LSU's, UGA's, USC's and OSU's of the world were probably after him too. This would mean that all of the schools that recruited him would have been wrong so I don't think it is fair to pinpoint UT's ability to evaluate talent when other top programs also saw a good prospect.I think the number of busts is more of a way to evaluate how well UT selects its recruits. If we have a high number of busts, then we probably aren't picking good guys to go after.