If we had a 10-3 record who thinks we get in the CFP?

#26
#26
Brandon88 said:
Thats my point.if it means noithing then why play it and might get a player injured?
Click to expand...

The entire process is flawed but who would want to play in a conference championship if they knew there was a chance to be knocked out the playoffs?

There are other teams that didn't make the conference championship who have guaranteed spots with no risk of losing another game.

The bigger issue is guaranteed spots for teams like Tulane and James Madison but of they didn't guarantee spots teams like this would almost never get chosen.
 
#27
#27
thehill98 said:
On its face this seems like a silly question, but on a deeper look. You are exactly right. What point at all was there in playing this game, not only did they not penalize Alabama, but didn’t reward Georgia either. In fact neither team moved at all. While I could see a small argument if it was somewhat of a close game, but that wasn’t the case. Looking at it from that perspective it’s not worth playing the game, and risk getting players hurt neither a chance of losing a spot or moving up for winning. Obviously I can’t stand Georgia or Alabama, but it’s hard to see a valid reason for playing when it obviously could hurt your team without any benefit even if you win.
Click to expand...

The bigger shocker was Ohio State only moving down to #2. They lost. Georgia won.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BernardKingGOAT, deatojl, posivol and 1 other person
#28
#28
Brandon88 said:
Plus lose the SEC Championship who thinks we get in?I defitney don't.Bama has lots of $ and Nick Saban rigged crap.
Click to expand...
Nonsense. I hate bama as much as the next person but the committee set precedent last year to not punish teams losing a title game. I think it’s also the right move.

Why should someone like ND benefit from not even playing in a conference?
 
#30
#30
thehill98 said:
On its face this seems like a silly question, but on a deeper look. You are exactly right. What point at all was there in playing this game, not only did they not penalize Alabama, but didn’t reward Georgia either. In fact neither team moved at all. While I could see a small argument if it was somewhat of a close game, but that wasn’t the case. Looking at it from that perspective it’s not worth playing the game, and risk getting players hurt neither a chance of losing a spot or moving up for winning. Obviously I can’t stand Georgia or Alabama, but it’s hard to see a valid reason for playing when it obviously could hurt your team without any benefit even if you win.
Click to expand...
I agree. But as long as the title games take in cash I think you’ll continue to see them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Brandon88
#33
#33
EastTNVol6240 said:
Nonsense. I hate bama as much as the next person but the committee set precedent last year to not punish teams losing a title game. I think it’s also the right move.

Why should someone like ND benefit from not even playing in a conference?
Click to expand...
EastTNVol6240 said:
Nonsense. I hate bama as much as the next person but the committee set precedent last year to not punish teams losing a title game. I think it’s also the right move.

Why should someone like ND benefit from not even playing in a conference?
Click to expand...
I would bet anyone Norte Dame could beat Bama if they played.Lots of people telling me the sec championship doesn't matter.Why does it matter if Notre Dame is not playing in a conference?
 
#34
#34
Vol8188 said:
So if we were 10-2 and lost the SECCG, yes, we would be in. This isn’t a conspiracy
Click to expand...

Brandon88 said:
You never answered the question because u know we don't.You know what i ment.
Click to expand...

Vol8188 said:
You literally just responded to me saying “we would be in”
Click to expand...

Brandon88 said:
Your a complete idiot u make no sense.
Click to expand...

I’m very clearly telling you, that I answered your question in the post you quoted while stating I wouldn’t answer your question.

This is sad at this point.
 
#39
#39
Brandon88 said:
I would bet anyone Norte Dame could beat Bama if they played.Lots of people telling me the sec championship doesn't matter.Why does it matter if Notre Dame is not playing in a conference?
Click to expand...
It’s an extra game….. does common sense not tell you if 1 team is getting judged on X amount of games shouldn’t all teams be judged on the same X amount of games? It really doesn’t matter. The committee has set that precedent. The committee is saying based on both teams regular season. We believe bama is the better team. What’s ND best win?

Bama beat UGA in Athens. You’re being irrational bc you hate bama.
 
#40
#40
EastTNVol6240 said:
It’s an extra game….. does common sense not tell you if 1 team is getting judged on X amount of games shouldn’t all teams be judged on the same X amount of games? It really doesn’t matter. The committee has set that precedent. The committee is saying based on both teams regular season. We believe bama is the better team. What’s ND best win?

Bama beat UGA in Athens. You’re being irrational bc you hate bama.
Click to expand...
I dont hate Bama just dont know how they got in and others here dont see it either..If they beat Georgia then it would have been different.The Sec Championship doesnt mean nothing why play the game?
 
#41
#41
Brandon88 said:
I dont hate Bama just dont know how they got in and others here dont see it either..If they beat Georgia then it would have been different.The Sec Championship doesnt mean nothing why play the game?
Click to expand...
Honestly they shouldn’t. But as long as it’s raking in money I’m sure they will. There’s no incentive and it’s a chance to injure players.

The problem isn’t Bama, it’s the auto bid spots for conference champions. There is absolutely less than 0% chance Tulane or JMU has a shot at a championship. It should be the 12 best regardless of conference. Bama deserves in, those two don’t. That’s where ND got pushed out.

Hopefully after this year they take a look at that nonsense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Big Al Orange
#42
#42
Vol8188 said:
The playoff committee has said for over a year that they would not punish the loser of the SECCG.

So if we were 10-2 and lost the SECCG, yes, we would be in. This isn’t a conspiracy

Also, use spell check before insulting people in the future. That way we will know what you “ment”
Click to expand...
Does this hold True for the Big 12 as well? Obviously it doesn’t because they are out. Because BYU was in until they lost. To the same team they lost to earlier in the year. The #4 ranked team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: posivol
#43
#43
kell7517 said:
Does this hold True for the Big 12 as well? Obviously it doesn’t because they are out. Because BYU was in until they lost. To the same team they lost to earlier in the year. The #4 ranked team.
Click to expand...

Where do you get the idea that BYU was in? They weren’t
 
#44
#44
The stupidity by the commissioners, who designed the CFP, left the loophole that allowed 2 G5 teams,both toward the bottom of the top 25 to get in is the problem. If a G5 team made it as a conference champion that should have cancelled their auto at-large bid.

What other conference or group has a guarantee of a At-Large bid? I’ll tell you , none. Only conference champs & only the 4 highest rated ones are guaranteed. It was terrible lack of vision to not expect this scenario when Boise & other G5 schools have earned a top 4 bid in the past.

Last year the seeding was a fiasco due to their ass-kissing of B12& G5. Now it’s even worse with 1 deserving team being eliminated for Tulane for heavens sake.
 
#45
#45
wmcovol said:
The stupidity by the commissioners, who designed the CFP, left the loophole that allowed 2 G5 teams,both toward the bottom of the top 25 to get in is the problem. If a G5 team made it as a conference champion that should have cancelled their auto at-large bid.

What other conference or group has a guarantee of a At-Large bid? I’ll tell you , none. Only conference champs & only the 4 highest rated ones are guaranteed. It was terrible lack of vision to not expect this scenario when Boise & other G5 schools have earned a top 4 bid in the past.

Last year the seeding was a fiasco due to their ass-kissing of B12& G5. Now it’s even worse with 1 deserving team being eliminated for Tulane for heavens sake.
Click to expand...

It’s the five highest. Not four
 
#47
#47
If we were 10-2 and then lost in the SECCG to a team we had beaten earlier in the year at their house, yes we'd be in.

The SEC and Big Ten are not going to stand by and let their conference championship game losers be knocked out of the playoffs.
 
#48
#48
wmcovol said:
4 highest rated conference champions now that PAC 12 doesn’t exist. That’s why Duke ain’t in it.
Click to expand...

It’s still 5. The 5 highest rated conference champions. Tulane and James Madison both won their conference

This is directly from their website

1765164323676.jpeg
 
#50
#50
thehill98 said:
On its face this seems like a silly question, but on a deeper look. You are exactly right. What point at all was there in playing this game, not only did they not penalize Alabama, but didn’t reward Georgia either. In fact neither team moved at all. While I could see a small argument if it was somewhat of a close game, but that wasn’t the case. Looking at it from that perspective it’s not worth playing the game, and risk getting players hurt neither a chance of losing a spot or moving up for winning. Obviously I can’t stand Georgia or Alabama, but it’s hard to see a valid reason for playing when it obviously could hurt your team without any benefit even if you win.
Click to expand...
Why? Because the SEC earns millions from this game
 
New Posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

Advertisement



Back
Top