After this year, their big OOC games are WVU (who is up and down) and then Purdue (a home and home I think). They're not working very hard to change the quality of their OOC schedule.
Here's what is published so far... no Oregons or OU's to be found....
MUTIGERS.COM - Official Athletic Site Official Athletic Site - Football
Let's throw aside that after the move they had to schedule additional opponents in 2012, 13, 14, and 15 with about a year to 2 before the game dates (seeing as how most of the major big name brand schools appear to schedule their Power 5 level OOC opponents anywhere from 5 to 10 years prior to the game).
Again, what major program is going to want to have a home and home with them?
They're not a major (or historical) brand name, so there's not as much recognition - broadcast or hype - that comes with playing them. That also pretty much means that they're going to be pretty low on the list of desired teams by any out-of-state neutral site kickoff classic and such.
They're not in a recruiting-rich state or even recruiting-rish area (like a Georgia or even say to the same degree as a Mississippi), so - unlike situations where the Ohio States, Notre Dames, and Michigans are scheduling games at southern schools in Virginia, Texas, Oklahoma, Georgia, etc., or even how the major brand schools regularly schedule home and homes with any of the California schools to try to create pipelines to further recruiting in those talent-laden areas - there's not really any sort of recruiting gain (pipeline or other) for a major brand that comes from having to play a game
at Columbia as well.
In some ways, it'd be almost like an Iowa school (maybe even a Utah) tried to schedule a home and home with Tennessee. In the modern setting, the response would pretty much be a "What's there to gain out of this for us? No. You can play a game here, but that's it. We're not coming there." Save a major-billed neutral-site matchup, I'm not sure if any Power-5 level school that's trying to to better their program and facilities would really agree to such as a yearly thing.
Heck, the only really "bigger" (note the quotation marks) teams have agreed to a longer-term scheduled return visits with them in the more modern/recent era have been Arizona State and Ole Miss.
Whether or not the desire for it is or isn't there on Missouri's part, there's not a lot of reason for the bigger (or better) schools - from their own standpoint - to agree to home and homes with them...there's not a lot to be gained in making the likely requested return visit. (They very well might have to agree to just throw away a home game's worth of revenue each and every season to get teams to consider such.)
