Hrc

#26
#26
and I guess the "right wing bloggers" created her illegal server at her home that she conducted all of her personal/sos activities.:furious3:

Calm down bro, you're hijacking your own thread.
 
#27
#27
Originally Posted by MG1968 View Post
I'm not the dumbass who left out the link in his OP so that people could make up their own minds about what Hillary may or may not have meant.

is that anything like her saying "I did not send or receive classified e-m"? It doesn't matter what it's marked classified or not. It's the content that matters. Just ask the fbi.

really?? no comment??? hard to argue about the facts isn't it? :dunno:

Calm down bro, you're hijacking your own thread.

what septic said
 
#30
#30
perfectly calm - just waiting for mg1968 to further enlighten us with his wisdom.

why, are you excited?:hi:

Originally Posted by MG1968 View Post
I'm not the dumbass who left out the link in his OP so that people could make up their own minds about what Hillary may or may not have meant.

is that anything like her saying "I did not send or receive classified e-m"? It doesn't matter what it's marked classified or not. It's the content that matters. Just ask the fbi.

really?? no comment??? hard to argue about the facts isn't it?

mg1968 - your silence speaks volumes.:good!:

goodnight all
 
#34
#34
Originally Posted by MG1968 View Post
I'm not the dumbass who left out the link in his OP so that people could make up their own minds about what Hillary may or may not have meant.

is that anything like her saying "I did not send or receive classified e-m"? It doesn't matter what it's marked classified or not. It's the content that matters. Just ask the fbi.

really?? no comment??? hard to argue about the facts isn't it?

mg1968 - your silence speaks volumes.:good!:

goodnight all


Classic right wing loon tactic itt.

1) Start thread by taking partial quote, out of context, and imply she is saying something she isn't.

2) When this is pointed out, go "Oh yeah? Well .... well ... Emails!"

So sadly predictable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#35
#35
Someone was saying something about the pissed off old white dude LG voting for Kasich?
 
#36
#36
Someone was saying something about the pissed off old white dude LG voting for Kasich?

landscape-1457632277-giphy.gif
 
#41
#41
Classic right wing loon tactic itt.

1) Start thread by taking partial quote, out of context, and imply she is saying something she isn't.

2) When this is pointed out, go "Oh yeah? Well .... well ... Emails!"

So sadly predictable.

It's not a partial quote and it's not entirely out of context.
 
#43
#43
Yeah, it is.

It is a full quote.

She is saying Iraq was a mistake - she's talking about the consequences of going into Iraq and the problems resulting from it. That is the context.

For the Libya she's saying no one got killed in the initial stages. However, if you want to compare our involvement in Iraq vs involvement in Libya it is incorrect to say no one got killed as a result in Libya.

So it is not entirely out of context.

If she's talking invasion operations only then she is technically correct but I doubt she's critiquing the invasion operations of Iraq rather than the whole decision to get involved. She chose to compare them on how many people we lost. She set the context.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#44
#44
Ok, I read that.

As I suspected, taken completely out of context by OP.

Pretty standard 'round here.

Look, I don't like her. As I've posted, if its her and Kasich, I'm likely to vote for Kasich. But its annoying when the right wing bloggers keep twisting things to create "news" or reports, all crap. See e.g. Breitbart twisting video of Sherrod, the heavily edited and falsified videos of Planned Parenthood, and crap like this.
Dear God, you are one big pile of hypocrisy
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#47
#47
Classic right wing loon tactic itt.

1) Start thread by taking partial quote, out of context, and imply she is saying something she isn't.

2) When this is pointed out, go "Oh yeah? Well .... well ... Emails!"

So sadly predictable.

so what your saying is - " what is , is " - runs in the family.
no mistaking the context here - https://www.bing.com/videos/search?...7FA7939C3D9500DB32757FA7939C3D950&FORM=EWREVC

she Knew she screwed up when she said/stuttered " right, Tim?":mega_shok:

just 1 question for you - :question:

if 1 of the 4 American men that were killed in bengazi, Libya was your son would still be ok with her saying " no Americans were killed in Libya?
 
#48
#48
3 questions on hillary:

1) why does she always seem so angry
2) where are all these "barriers" and "discrimination" towards every person alive except straight white men
3) they have had the white house for 7.5 years, why hasnt all this "discrimination" and "barriers" been cured
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#49
#49
3 questions on hillary:

1) why does she always seem so angry
2) where are all these "barriers" and "discrimination" towards every person alive except straight white men
3) they have had the white house for 7.5 years, why hasnt all this "discrimination" and "barriers" been cured

4) What kind of dog does she sound like when she barks at speaking engagements?
 

VN Store



Back
Top