Extremely doubtful. Look at the USC, Mizzou, and Kentucky games as examples why.
Against USC we had 38 points at half and ended the game w/45.
1. USC adjusted after the initial shellshock somewhat.
2. Heupel took his foot off the gas. Up 38 to 7, he started running clock. Still looking to score, but w/a 31 point lead, you don't want to risk several series of fast three & out series that give the ball back to the offense to catch up. Early blowouts where we can stack points in some ways work against us.
Against Mizzou we put up 62 so did hit that +50 points average. But 45 of those points were in the first half compared to 17 in the second. Again, CJH took his foot off the gas to run clock when the game was well in hand.
Against Kentucky we put up 45. It was a competitive game from start to finish where CJH kept his foot on the gas the entire game and we kept scoring. 24 in the first half and 21 in the second. But even then we didn't crack 50 points because Kentucky ran a clock-possession offense w/49 rushing attempts.
You have to go all the way back to 2013 to find a team (Baylor) that average over 50 PPG for the season. And that was in the Big12 where they don't have SEC defenses.