So just started reading the first book.....Does each individual book run hand in hand with each season? Or what? Should I read the first book and then watch season 1 or does the first season have somethings in it from the second book?
I just watched the finale last night. I hate watching shows week to week so I generally wait til a seasons over and watch it all over a week or so.
Regardless, I'll say that I'm extremely disappointed with the John Snow death. It just doesn't make any sense. They've spent 5 seasons building this character and now, for the first time IMO, he become relevant and they kill him. Most of the other major deaths, though they've been shocking, have at least made sense but not this one.
So it really points to the rumors about him being resurrected somehow probably being true. Like I said... They spent 5 seasons building him up as the one who will lead the humans in the war against the white walkers and they kill him just before that war starts? That would be borderline retarded writing. But I feel like resurrecting him would almost be just as lame. I hate it when shows "kill" a main character and it turns out it was merely for shock value because they turn out to not be dead somehow. Maybe they pull it off. It's a great show so who knows? But I can't help but feel like this is the first time they've really dug themselves in a pretty big plot hole. Other shows do this all the time but this is one of the few that I expect better from.
I haven't read a great deal of this thread so if this has been addressed already then... Sorry.
I just watched the finale last night. I hate watching shows week to week so I generally wait til a seasons over and watch it all over a week or so.
Regardless, I'll say that I'm extremely disappointed with the John Snow death. It just doesn't make any sense. They've spent 5 seasons building this character and now, for the first time IMO, he become relevant and they kill him. Most of the other major deaths, though they've been shocking, have at least made sense but not this one.
So it really points to the rumors about him being resurrected somehow probably being true. Like I said... They spent 5 seasons building him up as the one who will lead the humans in the war against the white walkers and they kill him just before that war starts? That would be borderline retarded writing. But I feel like resurrecting him would almost be just as lame. I hate it when shows "kill" a main character and it turns out it was merely for shock value because they turn out to not be dead somehow. Maybe they pull it off. It's a great show so who knows? But I can't help but feel like this is the first time they've really dug themselves in a pretty big plot hole. Other shows do this all the time but this is one of the few that I expect better from.
I haven't read a great deal of this thread so if this has been addressed already then... Sorry.
This season relied on shock value that had not been properly built up more than any other, though. The burning of Shireen was utterly pointless, and the Stannis arc culminates with the greatest military strategist in Westeros being destroyed by 20 good men and "killed" by... Brienne. Sansa's arc was pretty bad in these terms as well - there was just no character growth there, even after that controversial scene.
There was a post on reddit that I agree with, saying that the series has gone from the realistic approach that bad things happen to good people to the approach where the villains can perform outrageously stupid actions without any consequences. It's just soul-crushing to watch - any moment of triumph is ruined seconds later.
The "dead but not really dead" thing frustrates me as well - Martin has done it in about 7-8 different cases in the recent books. It gets very repetitive as a concept.
I think that's pretty silly.
I won't go that far, but I get that point. A lot of bad guys have gotten punished, though. The Lannisters are a great example of that.
I just watched the finale last night. I hate watching shows week to week so I generally wait til a seasons over and watch it all over a week or so.
Regardless, I'll say that I'm extremely disappointed with the John Snow death. It just doesn't make any sense. They've spent 5 seasons building this character and now, for the first time IMO, he become relevant and they kill him. Most of the other major deaths, though they've been shocking, have at least made sense but not this one.
So it really points to the rumors about him being resurrected somehow probably being true. Like I said... They spent 5 seasons building him up as the one who will lead the humans in the war against the white walkers and they kill him just before that war starts? That would be borderline retarded writing. But I feel like resurrecting him would almost be just as lame. I hate it when shows "kill" a main character and it turns out it was merely for shock value because they turn out to not be dead somehow. Maybe they pull it off. It's a great show so who knows? But I can't help but feel like this is the first time they've really dug themselves in a pretty big plot hole. Other shows do this all the time but this is one of the few that I expect better from.
I haven't read a great deal of this thread so if this has been addressed already then... Sorry.
There are educated guesses here based on Snow's fate based on the everything Game of Thrones has to offer, author, actors, show, books, etc. Read at your own peril, but regardless it's still just a heavily foreshadowed and hypothesizing estimate.
or even just to free him of his oath to the Night's Watch and hopefully enact some revenge on them.
you would be doing yourself a huge disservice if you just went right into the next upcoming episode first. get on hbogo, start on episode 1, season 1, binge throughout whole series, and while in binge, do not, I repeat, DO NOT, look up any GoT related info until you are caught up, for "The internet is dark, and full of spoilers."
Enjoy it dude.
