photovol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2012
- Messages
- 17,015
- Likes
- 9,258
If you want to play prevent defense when you have the lead in the 4th qtr only to eventually lose the game knock yourself out. I for one think the idea is just talk and if we do hire him, we may as well bring Phil back. We’re trying to forward not backwards.Apparently Chavis is being interviewed for DC job. Hell yes.
Chavis had good defenses at UT when we had elite players on defense. We don’t have elite players on that side of the ball. We need a DC that can do more with less.If you want to play prevent defense when you have the lead in the 4th qtr only to eventually lose the game knock yourself out. I for one think the idea is just talk and if we do hire him, we may as well bring Phil back. We’re trying to forward not backwards.
Naaaaah I don't buy that. Nobody would offer a contract that would pay YOU if YOU quit. Even UT isn't that stupid.I think he has 450,000 for 2 years, 900,000 guaranteed, whether he quits, is let go, or stays. If that is true, it's his call, nothing we can do.
Now, if CJH wants to keep him, he can offer him more money and clarify his title ...
Steele’s Contract. If he quits he doesn’t get paid.Naaaaah I don't buy that. Nobody would offer a contract that would pay YOU if YOU quit. Even UT isn't that stupid.
If Burns is hired there’s nothing for Tee.According to reports, these are supposed to be following him from UCF. Not sure if their roles will be the same here. And they have not officially been announced. Osovet, Steele, and Tee are possible carry overs. Again, nothing official yet.
Glenn Elarbee OL
Alex Golesh TE
Kodi Burns WR
Joey Haxlze QB
Matt Merritt RB.
Because his contract says if we don’t offer him an on the field position, we owe him $900k.So then.... why not let Steele quit? Maybe that way we don't have to pay him.