General Jack
Vorschlaghammer
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2004
- Messages
- 13,430
- Likes
- 5,303
Of course it is. Nobody claimed it was "all" or "mostly" about Tennessee. However, the pub our program got during the last couple of weeks because of Peyton is free publicity. I don't see how that could not be a good thing.I'll grant you that the Manning name is associated with UT right now and that it is a nice feather in your cap. But I think that this is more about Manning finally winning the big one for himself more than anything else.
Exactly. I don't think it'd mean half as much for the 'good for UT' side of the argument if Cutcliffe was no longer at UT coaching QBs. But he is.Maybe; maybe not. But it is a pretty ringing endorsement for a guy like David Cutcliffe to be able to sit in a kid's living room and say "I made that guy. I can make you."
Of course it is. Nobody claimed it was "all" or "mostly" about Tennessee. However, the pub our program got during the last couple of weeks because of Peyton is free publicity. I don't see how that could not be a good thing.
UT is not generally known as QB University.
Again, I don't think anybody is saying that but you.
Working the cover 2 is Manning's bread and butter.I kinda got that drift from folks, but maybe I'm wrong.
Tell you what, though, I will congratulate both Manning and the UT program for the W tonight. I thought that Manning directed some excellent drives and he seemed to settle down after a rocky start and really take advantage of what the Bears were doing.
what were they doing?![]()
yep. never a bad thing.:thumbsup:Maybe; maybe not. But it is a pretty ringing endorsement for a guy like David Cutcliffe to be able to sit in a kid's living room and say "I made that guy. I can make you."
:yes:Of course it is. Nobody claimed it was "all" or "mostly" about Tennessee. However, the pub our program got during the last couple of weeks because of Peyton is free publicity. I don't see how that could not be a good thing.
i think it's already been said, but no one ever said anything about tangible results. it is a feather in the cap....and one that i think they will/can/must show prominently, often.Agreed. Like I said, feather in the cap. Just saying let's not get carried away, thinking that the five star kids are going to be faxing in their commitments because of this, that's all.
:bow2:Doesn't matter. We already have those letters from the five-stars. :shades:
They played very far off the receivers for the first 8-10 yards of any route, it seemed. Didn't blitz enough. That bend don't break thing was a poor strategy in my opinion. Manning recognized it and frequently took advantage, getting the ball to a receiver 5 yards out who then had time to turn up field and find a crease.