volsknx
The only people who dislike winners are losers!
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2021
- Messages
- 744
- Likes
- 1,015
If thats the case, we should be fine. In fact we should thrive. We havent won double digit games in a decade, botched multiple coaching searches, have a pending NCAA investigation, and the UT brand is still pretty much what it has always been. There are only a handful of bigger brands in college sports but we have been right there with damn near anybody.Excitement & desire to follow Tennessee football this coming season?
I'm all for reasonable amount given to athletes but the unlimited amount just ruins the feeling of college sports going forward. Turns it into who has the most money & best marketing programs for players
My interest in college football has dwindled a bit since the late 90's when the BCS was started.College football used to be unique. Regional pride and winning your conference was #1 on the agenda each season. If your team made a Bowl, it was a big deal. Today, it's all or nothing. 8-9 wins gets coaches fired. NIL and paying players is just going to make everything worse.
I’m with you Peay. I was challenged recently when I posted the CLEAR viewership numbers for NBA and stated it’s getting close to critical numbers (viewership numbers are something I kinda keep up with). Now the MLB Sunday game has lost almost 50% of its viewership too. AND those professional league are keenly aware of those numbers. That’s almost exclusively why we’re seeing those leagues desperately trying to plant footings in the foreign market. There’s no growth to be found in the USA and the US numbers are MASSIVELY tanking. I say this to add the NCAA is on the exact same course if something doesn’t happen soon. I agree. This could spell a death blow to collegiate sports as we know it…and I’m not a pessimist at all…but a realist.My interest in college football has dwindled a bit since the late 90's when the BCS was started.College football used to be unique. Regional pride and winning your conference was #1 on the agenda each season. If your team made a Bowl, it was a big deal. Today, it's all or nothing. 8-9 wins gets coaches fired. NIL and paying players is just going to make everything worse.
Four things come to mind (imo):
1. It will only make it more difficult for Tennessee (and 95% of schools) to crawl out of the gutter and college athletics, more so, continue to have just a few teams make the playoffs every year. (same trend but much worse)
2. Neyland will never be filled at 100% capacity again. This could be a completely separate issue, but ticket pricing will continue to rise and everyone will be watching from home. (same trend but much worse)
3. We will see an exorbitant increase in selfish/bonehead decisions forced upon 17/18 year old kids and the impending ******** that goes with it will make this old man (35) even less interested in the process.
4. Lower rated players will not see the field due to higher paid player being played because of that reason, you are now 'legally' invested more. So that's cool.
Side note: I'm fine with them getting paid/compensation over current conditions. One question that I haven't seen raised is when do the University's start issuing fines to 'student athletes' for breaking team/university violations?
This NIL is the final destruction of College Football. Money puts ESPN, CBS, etc. in more control (Who gets on TV gets the most exposure, right? Most Exposure most money?) Could CBS, ESPN etc influence recruiting?
And the point not even being mentioned is this: These player images that are so valuable, are only valuable because of the school they go to!! If the greatest player of all time was playing for a jr. college he would get very little in endorsements. Players going to the BIG 5 conferences and particular the Ohio ST. Notre DAme, Alabama, etc is why their image is worth anything. It's the school not the player that is worth the money.
This def opens up Pandora’s box as to what college football will look like in 5 years it’s going to get real slimy and sleazy no doubt and anything goes. I expect the rich to get richer such as Bama, Ohio St, Clemson and the Georgia’s of the world.
I wonder if they will be taxed on that income ?! Can they still be considered amateur if they do ?! Will the 1%ers be capped at certain amount they can earn ?! This is going to be a mess for years to come. I'm not sure what the solution is.But now the amount they get will be made public.
I'm waiting for a star player, getting paid a lot of money, to get hurt. The back-up comes in and wins a couple of games, and then refuses to play until he is paid.
What happens in the situation like Salter? Does he have to repay the money he got since he can no longer fulfill his duties of representing the company that paid him?
Some articles have mentioned congress will continue working with the NCAA to still ensure they can keep a reasonable amount of rulemaking ability over the matter.
Prove they were undercompensated. Compensation is NEVER legitimately tied to revenues and you cannot tie program success to individual performance.Well, ya know, the main thing that makes the sport what it is, is in knowing the players are being severely undercompensated. That apparently makes a lot of people very happy.
Honestly, I just get the vibe of jealousy. As in...how dare these kids make much more than me! I won't support them now! Weird vibes all the way around tbh.
There must be a collective bargaining agreement, whether it be national or conference wide, there has to be a protection against exactly what you stated.
Otherwise athletes who run track, play softball, or play soccer and devote an equal amount of their time to being an athlete as well as a student won’t be compensated fairly for their time. And yes, college soccer players should get more than the federal minimum wage - there is plenty money to go around for this.
Makes me think that sports programs have operated at such a profit because they weren’t paying athletes, and if it isn’t a tax-free profit then how will the funding and budgeting of athletic departments change due to this. All questions that are looking for answers in the near future.
These are all great questions I think there is a ton of unknowns right now with this and I’m not sure the people in charge know what the answers are. Once you go down this road there is no going back. College football will be forever changed and probaly not for the better.
Not if they use some of their NIL endorsement income to repay some of their scholarship grants.Excitement & desire to follow Tennessee football this coming season?
I'm all for reasonable amount given to athletes but the unlimited amount just ruins the feeling of college sports going forward. Turns it into who has the most money & best marketing programs for players
I think there will be far more confusion than discussion.Opening up not a can of worms but a 55 gallon drum of worms. Plenty to discuss this summer.
There are lots in smaller, less than glorified sports making bank right now due to their social media presenceThere must be a collective bargaining agreement, whether it be national or conference wide, there has to be a protection against exactly what you stated.
Otherwise athletes who run track, play softball, or play soccer and devote an equal amount of their time to being an athlete as well as a student won’t be compensated fairly for their time. And yes, college soccer players should get more than the federal minimum wage - there is plenty money to go around for this.
Makes me think that sports programs have operated at such a profit because they weren’t paying athletes, and if it isn’t a tax-free profit then how will the funding and budgeting of athletic departments change due to this. All questions that are looking for answers in the near future.