Gun control debate (merged)

#24,601
#24,601
Grand Vol said:
Hey, 99% of the time the USAF gets the Army hand-me-downs. Every once in a while they do something for themselves and it works.
Click to expand...

LOL

When we'd have a FAC team deploy with us it was always HOLY CHIT, where did you get that? They always had the newest and nicest TA50 and gadgets, they were showing up with gore-tex when we were just hearing rumors about it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
#24,609
#24,609
This isn't good, yeah they didn't rule on the legality of the ban so it's possible that they take it up in another case down the road but still it's troubling. Letting this rule stand gives the government the power to arbitrarily outlaw the possession of any item they see fit without recompense or grandfathering. That's why I've always said this EO was more about person property rights than it was gun rights.



Bump-Stock Ban Left Intact as Supreme Court Rejects Challenges
 
  • Like
Reactions: GroverCleveland, 85SugarVol and Orangeslice13
#24,610
#24,610
hog88 said:
This isn't good, yeah they didn't rule on the legality of the ban so it's possible that they take it up in another case down the road but still it's troubling. Letting this rule stand gives the government the power to arbitrarily outlaw the possession of any item they see fit without recompense or grandfathering. That's why I've always said this EO was more about person property rights than it was gun rights.



Bump-Stock Ban Left Intact as Supreme Court Rejects Challenges
Click to expand...

As a matter of firearms the .gov could actually make a decent argument that a bump stock is little more than an NFA item that happens to circumvent the FCG. The boldened is the real issue here.

One can hope that somewhere in the pipe is something that disambiguates things in a way that addresses the property aspect.
 
#24,611
#24,611
hndog609 said:
As a matter of firearms the .gov could actually make a decent argument that a bump stock is little more than an NFA item that happens to circumvent the FCG. The boldened is the real issue here.

One can hope that somewhere in the pipe is something that disambiguates things in a way that addresses the property aspect.
Click to expand...

I think the challenges have went about it the wrong way, they should be challenging the violation of property rights and not on the grounds of violating the 2A. If I'm not mistaken automatic weapons owned prior to the NFA were grandfathered in and people were allowed to keep them and pass them on to relatives.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider, GroverCleveland, hndog609 and 1 other person
#24,615
#24,615
  • Like
Reactions: GroverCleveland, norrislakevol, SlipKidVol and 4 others
#24,616
#24,616
kiddiedoc said:
It's long past the time that all kitchen knives are banned. I can't even count the number of unnecessary injuries I've suffered from a hasty chop, the blades are entirely too long for regular cooking, and those black handles are really scary looking.
Click to expand...
And who needs *serrated blades? Is the hunk of meat you are cooking wearing kevlar?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: GroverCleveland, norrislakevol, kiddiedoc and 1 other person
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement





Back
Top