Gun control debate (merged)

Lol, watching Fox. Karl Rove just decried the notion of getting rid of the liability shield for gun manufacturers, and I quote: "imagine if a person in a car accident could sue the manufacturer of the car."

LOL. What an f-tard !! You CAN sue the manufacturer if you can show a design defect caused the accident. Well, how about victims of mass shootings show that manufacturers could make these safer, by limiting capacity for example.

Sheesz the Fox echo chamber is just sinking further and further into complete idiocy.
If you can show there is a defect in the gun manufacturing process that lead to a mass shooting I welcome suing the manufacturer.

I have yet to see a case of a defect causing these shootings though.

To be accurate, which I know you dont want to be, suing the gun manufacturer for a shooting would be like suing if the car was capable of driving faster than the slowest possible speed limit. You sue the manufacturer when the end user isnt ultimately responsible for their actions.

So for guns, if a safety was on and some DA pulled the trigger and shot someone, and you could absolutely prove the gun was on safe, then yeah the manufacturer is in deep doodoo. I would still put the user in jail for breaking three of the biggest gun safety rules, but the manufacturer would also be culpable for the fault in their safety mechanism.
 
It's a weapon of war that couldn't do **** against our army.

Also the people saying the cops with AR's were scared of an AR therefore ban the AR's, how's about firing those cops instead? If you don't think 20 of you can take one guy with a rifle get a new line of work.
 
If you can show there is a defect in the gun manufacturing process that lead to a mass shooting I welcome suing the manufacturer.

I have yet to see a case of a defect causing these shootings though.

To be accurate, which I know you dont want to be, suing the gun manufacturer for a shooting would be like suing if the car was capable of driving faster than the slowest possible speed limit. You sue the manufacturer when the end user isnt ultimately responsible for their actions.

So for guns, if a safety was on and some DA pulled the trigger and shot someone, and you could absolutely prove the gun was on safe, then yeah the manufacturer is in deep doodoo. I would still put the user in jail for breaking three of the biggest gun safety rules, but the manufacturer would also be culpable for the fault in their safety mechanism.

So can we sue pencil companies if our kids fail a test?
 
I cannot get over that one of the more vocal gun grabbers asked, after seeing two rifles on the same platform with complete different aesthetics, why they made an “assault rifle” version of the weapon.
Who knew, of all things, that it would be the guns furniture that determines its acceptability.
 
Advertisement





Back
Top