luthervol
rational (x) and reasonable (y)
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2016
- Messages
- 48,506
- Likes
- 20,976
You said iPhones were designed to send and receive messages.
What are guns designed for?
This is just a stupid argument for gun control.I'm not trying to spin it.
I'm trying to get you to read with understanding. I've said it twice
Maybe the third time is the charm:
All to often people use guns as intended to kill innocent people.
There is nothing outside of maiming and killing that a gun is intended for. Vehicles, while potentially deadly, are used 99.9% of the time for transportation. Knives, while potentially deadly, are used 99.9% of the time for utility cutting applications. Digoxin, while potentially deadly, is used 99.9% of the time for diseases related to the heart.Hunting , shooting projectiles at high rates of speed , self defensive , offensive if needed to prevent yourself or someone from being harmed . Firearms have a very diverse set of applications . One would think since your diversity tent is so big and welcoming , it would for sure hold a place of admiration under your canopy.
Epic goalpost shift to maiming and killing in general rather than what the discussion was about.There is nothing outside of maiming and killing that a gun is intended for. Vehicles, while potentially deadly, are used 99.9% of the time for transportation. Knives, while potentially deadly, are used 99.9% of the time for utility cutting applications. Digoxin, while potentially deadly, is used 99.9% of the time for diseases related to the heart.
Acting oblivious to these facts makes anyone look disingenuous and ignorant.
I'm just trying to wrap my head around you apparently believing guns are intended to kill innocent people. Not defense, not to hunt, nothing beneficial to people whatsoever. Just murder.I'm not trying to spin it.
I'm trying to get you to read with understanding. I've said it twice
Maybe the third time is the charm:
All to often people use guns as intended to kill innocent people.
So a gun can't be used as a deterrent to avoid more maiming and killing?There is nothing outside of maiming and killing that a gun is intended for. Vehicles, while potentially deadly, are used 99.9% of the time for transportation. Knives, while potentially deadly, are used 99.9% of the time for utility cutting applications. Digoxin, while potentially deadly, is used 99.9% of the time for diseases related to the heart.
Acting oblivious to these facts makes anyone look disingenuous and ignorant.
Funny, here I am thinking you're being stupid about it. That maiming and killing can put food on your table or make someone think twice about breaking into your home or hurting your family. It really just depends on whose hands the gun is in. A gun is a tool. It's the intentions of the user you have to worry about.Lol, sure it can… the threat of it maiming or killing IS the deterrent. Can’t believe some of you act so dumb about this.
I understand, my guns put food on my table annually… that’s not the point. You intentionally confuse design with intention, and those are two completely different ideas.Funny, here I am thinking you're being stupid about it. That maiming and killing can put food on your table or make someone think twice about breaking into your home or hurting your family. It really just depends on whose hands the gun is in. A gun is a tool. It's the intentions of the user you have to worry about.
I don't think I'm the one who confused design with intention. You clearly stated a gun is intended for maiming and killing. Intent is in the possessor of the firearm, not the firearm itself.I understand, my guns put food on my table annually… that’s not the point. You intentionally confuse design with intention, and those are two completely different ideas.
There is nothing outside of maiming and killing that a gun is intended for. Vehicles, while potentially deadly, are used 99.9% of the time for transportation. Knives, while potentially deadly, are used 99.9% of the time for utility cutting applications. Digoxin, while potentially deadly, is used 99.9% of the time for diseases related to the heart.
Acting oblivious to these facts makes anyone look disingenuous and ignorant.
You make no counterpoint or intelligent contemplation about what I said, just a lot of meaningless words, congrats.You talk to about being oblivious and ignorant right after you post.. “ there is nothing outside of maiming and killing that a gun is intended for “ . May I politely say that you are in way over your head in this thread if you can’t do better than that , you’ll get eaten alive in here .
You make no counterpoint or intelligent contemplation about what I said, just a lot of meaningless words, congrats.
I assume, then, by “eaten alive” you really mean inundated with ignorance. With that, I agree. Experience with firearms has nothing to do with this discussion, but I assure you I have plenty of experience and (no offense) probably a larger arsenal than you do.This entire thread is full of counter points to you liberals that float in here on occasion and post stupid crap like you just did . I could show you examples of why you are wrong , it’s common knowledge to anyone that knows firearms but I’ve learned that making you do your own research so you can’t blow it off is better for teaching purposes .![]()
I assume, then, by “eaten alive” you really mean inundated with ignorance. With that, I agree. Experience with firearms has nothing to do with this discussion, but I assure you I have plenty of experience and (no offense) probably a larger arsenal than you do.
Maybe that’s true, maybe that’s not. The point is not a p*ssing contest, the point is I’m correct about design vs intent being two completely different ideas even though they are conflated as the same here quite often.Without knowing anything about you .. I can honestly say ( no offense ) but I highly doubt that you do . I’ll go a step further and say ( with confidence ) that I’ve owed and then sold or traded more firearms than you’ve ever touched . Lol
Maybe that’s true, maybe that’s not. The point is not a p*ssing contest, the point is I’m correct about design vs intent being two completely different ideas even though they are conflated as the same here quite often.
