Gun control debate (merged)

#12,458
#12,458
OrangeBlood4life said:
Argument on on 2nd amendment meaning muskets:
All armys only had muskets, and if you think FF didt think there would be advancements you are delusional. Shall not be infringed

Argument that u cant fight govt with AR's amyway.

We have been fighting terrorist since 2002 in flip flops and ak47s. You cant just bomb a city, so armed citizens can stand up to a gov't.

Argument you dont need an Ar or morethan 10 round magazine..
I personally knew a farmer that a few feral hogs charge him and his youngest son, let's just say you only had 10 shots with a pistol.... are you or your young son alive, or gored and injured for life?

Anyone that's ever shot a gun, knows 10 shots isn't enough. The unlikely event where there are more than 1 or 2 attackers is slim, but if it saves just one life right???
Click to expand...

So we need semi-automatic weapons so feral hogs don't kill us? That's a new one.
 
#12,459
#12,459
bnhunt said:
So we need semi-automatic weapons so feral hogs don't kill us? That's a new one.
Click to expand...

I want a semi auto because if three guys are coming in my window to do harm to my family , I don’t have just one shot before i have to try and beat them with what is the equivalent of a stick after that shot . Make sense ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: DynaLo, davethevol, joevol33 and 2 others
#12,460
#12,460
0nelilreb said:
I want a semi auto because if three guys are coming in my window to do harm to my family , I don’t have just one shot before i have to try and beat them with what is the equivalent of a stick after that shot . Make sense ?
Click to expand...
No clearly all you need is a musket to fend off a herd of feral hogs. That’s all the founding fathers had. Duh.
 
  • Like
Reactions: davethevol, joevol33, InVOLuntary and 1 other person
#12,465
#12,465
I’ll never understand the gall of some people to try to dictate to others what they can/can’t use to protect themselves and their family. If you don’t like guns, don’t buy one. Some people accept responsibility for their own well being. Other people cannot seem to grasp that concept and that’s exactly why this country is in the state it’s in now. I will never allow my safety to be dictated by another.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 85SugarVol, BennesseeVols, DynaLo and 8 others
#12,466
#12,466
0nelilreb said:
I want a semi auto because if three guys are coming in my window to do harm to my family , I don’t have just one shot before i have to try and beat them with what is the equivalent of a stick after that shot . Make sense ?
Click to expand...
Nope. I actually think you and your family are less likely to get hurt if you don't start a shootout, but that's just me. However, if your gun never left your house I honestly don't care if you want to play cops and robbers in your home since it poses no risk to me or my family. It's when you start making decisions with guns outside of your home that I have an issue as you have absolutely no right to put my family at risk because you perceive some type of threat.
 
#12,467
#12,467
DEFENDTHISHOUSE said:
I’ll never understand the gall of some people to try to dictate to others what they can/can’t use to protect themselves and their family. If you don’t like guns, don’t buy one. Some people accept responsibility for their own well being. Other people cannot seem to grasp that concept and that’s exactly why this country is in the state it’s in now. I will never allow my safety to be dictated by another.
Click to expand...

Because you are putting my family at risk when you make decisions with guns in public places. Why do you have the right to make those decisions for my family? Again, in your own home is a different story.
 
#12,470
#12,470
bnhunt said:
Nope. I actually think you and your family are less likely to get hurt if you don't start a shootout, but that's just me. However, if your gun never left your house I honestly don't care if you want to play cops and robbers in your home since it poses no risk to me or my family. It's when you start making decisions with guns outside of your home that I have an issue as you have absolutely no right to put my family at risk because you perceive some type of threat.
Click to expand...
Do you realize that people (both good and bad) carry firearms around you everyday nearly everywhere you go?
 
  • Like
Reactions: BennesseeVols and tennvols77
#12,471
#12,471
bnhunt said:
Our perceptions or definitions of what a wolf is could be and probably are entirely different. Again, you have no right to put my family at risk merely to protect your "right" to unfettered firearms.
Click to expand...
I’d bet if you’re in a place when a shooting happens and a citizen is armed and takes out the guy, you’ll be damn glad he/her was there to make decisions for you and your family. Then again, you’d probably sue.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tennvols77, davethevol, InVOLuntary and 1 other person
#12,472
#12,472
DEFENDTHISHOUSE said:
Because someone has to protect the sheep from the wolves.
Click to expand...
When you see someone from the middle east you automatically think terrorist or if you see a Hispanic person you think rapist or murderer, so you are automatically perceiving a threat or "wolf" and are more than likely to be ready to use your gun where I perceive no threat and don't want someone like you "protecting" me and putting my family at risk merely because your perceive some type of threat.
 
#12,473
#12,473
bnhunt said:
Our perceptions or definitions of what a wolf is could be and probably are entirely different. Again, you have no right to put my family at risk merely to protect your "right" to unfettered firearms.
Click to expand...
Your family isn’t at risk by the mere possessions of firearms by others except if they are criminals. They fact you don’t want to protect them doesn’t mean that others share that weakness
 
  • Like
Reactions: CABVOL and tennvols77
#12,474
#12,474
bnhunt said:
When you someone from the middle east you automatically think terrorist or if you see a Hispanic person you think rapist or murderer, so you are automatically perceiving a threat or "wolf" and are more than likely to be ready to use your gun where I perceive no threat and don't want someone like you "protecting" me and putting my family at risk merely because your perceive some type of threat.
Click to expand...
Who said that? Looks like you are the one with the irrational “perceiving” here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: davethevol, NurseGoodVol and InVOLuntary
#12,475
#12,475
DEFENDTHISHOUSE said:
I’d bet if you’re in a place when a shooting happens and a citizen is armed and takes out the guy, you’ll be damn glad he/her was there to make decisions for you and your family. Then again, you’d probably sue.
Click to expand...

If you caused unwanted attention to my family because you were trying to be billy badass then I would probably sue the crap out of you.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement





Back
Top