Gun control debate (merged)

I love the look on everyone’s face around me at the range when we break out the 15s. I agree that required ownership is stupid
I generally draw eyes when I am there, or my gun does. Never understood the fascination until someone showed up with a louder gun. then I had to go see what it was, and it all made sense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: joevol33
www.cnn.com/2019/03/25/us/unlicensed-gun-dealers-law-invs/index.html

A common refrain from Second Amendment advocates is that the country does not need any new gun control laws; it just needs to enforce the ones already on the books. But the Firearms Owners' Protection Act is widely seen by those in federal law enforcement as more of a hindrance than a tool, according to current and former ATF agents and prosecutors interviewed by CNN.
 
www.cnn.com/2019/03/25/us/unlicensed-gun-dealers-law-invs/index.html

A common refrain from Second Amendment advocates is that the country does not need any new gun control laws; it just needs to enforce the ones already on the books. But the Firearms Owners' Protection Act is widely seen by those in federal law enforcement as more of a hindrance than a tool, according to current and former ATF agents and prosecutors interviewed by CNN.

Umm let’s see, law enforcement is catching and prosecuting people for breaking the law in regards to selling guns. What’s the problem?
 
Umm let’s see, law enforcement is catching and prosecuting people for breaking the law in regards to selling guns. What’s the problem?
lol....The problem is obvious. Read the article. The law is intentionally vague..
 
www.cnn.com/2019/03/25/us/unlicensed-gun-dealers-law-invs/index.html

A common refrain from Second Amendment advocates is that the country does not need any new gun control laws; it just needs to enforce the ones already on the books. But the Firearms Owners' Protection Act is widely seen by those in federal law enforcement as more of a hindrance than a tool, according to current and former ATF agents and prosecutors interviewed by CNN.




Who gives a Fu(k about CNN, only losers and commies
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
yet they still catch the violators, so again what’s the problem?
I guess all of the "non-violators" who actually are "violators"......that's sort of the point!!!! The law was written so people could violate without technically violating......you see?
 
I guess all of the "non-violators" who actually are "violators"......that's sort of the point!!!! The law was written so people could violate without technically violating......you see?

Nope, it was written to protect citizens from overzealous law enforcement while allowing law enforcement an avenue to pursue violators.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
Nope, it was written to protect citizens from overzealous law enforcement while allowing law enforcement an avenue to pursue violators.
Nope. The law sucks and is being abused as it was intended to be abused.
 
www.cnn.com/2019/03/25/us/unlicensed-gun-dealers-law-invs/index.html

A common refrain from Second Amendment advocates is that the country does not need any new gun control laws; it just needs to enforce the ones already on the books. But the Firearms Owners' Protection Act is widely seen by those in federal law enforcement as more of a hindrance than a tool, according to current and former ATF agents and prosecutors interviewed by CNN.

I appreciate anything that frustrates the ATF.
 
I know a guy that was busted for being an "unlicensed dealer" he was buying guns at yard/estate sales and had a shady pawn shop outside of KC he purchased from, sold 200-300 guns a year doing that. So the law works and no need to change it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
Advertisement





Back
Top