This is so counterintuitive. How could it be the case that making guns harder to get could decrease mass shootings? I mean, come on. We all know we're safer with more guns floating around. The logic of this is just so hard to grasp.
First, I lol'ed at the British Medical Journal.
Second, I lol at the definition of "mass shooting" (4 or more involved)
Third, they cherry pick their stats since they only went from 2010 onward.
Nice try though. They did cherry pick their stats.
State gun laws, gun ownership, and mass shootings in the US: cross sectional time series
They always cherry pick stats, terms, laws, etc. and the gun control crowd never fact check them. Gun control people are the most uniformed bunch it's almost scary but also makes them look like complete idiots during debate. It's a win win in the long run..First, I lol'ed at the British Medical Journal.
Second, I lol at the definition of "mass shooting" (4 or more involved)
Third, they cherry pick their stats since they only went from 2010 onward.
Nice try though. They did cherry pick their stats.
State gun laws, gun ownership, and mass shootings in the US: cross sectional time series
This is so counterintuitive. How could it be the case that making guns harder to get could decrease mass shootings? I mean, come on. We all know we're safer with more guns floating around. The logic of this is just so hard to grasp.
