Greenland

The chairman of the "Board of Peace" also is not the U.S. President, it's Donald Trump personally (until he steps down or dies), which seems weird but hey

Anyone who doesn't see the "Board of Peace" for the absurdity it is has lost the plot so long ago there's no hope for recovery.
 
Just thought of something, wasn't an >100k payment to each Greenlander part of USA offer? If so, I can probably round up >50k Americans that would want that money, immigrate there, and then have us all vote to join USA. Problem solved. Pocket the money then come home 😆
 
  • Like
Reactions: GroverCleveland
That's why he asked for the one billion to join. Its a scam for him to make money.
Never met a grift he didn’t like. Just another embarrassment to add to the long list. Again I ask the question. Is it too much to just have a little bit of decorum befitting the office of the President of the United States? All I see is a 4 year Ponzi scheme.
 
Just thought of something, wasn't an >100k payment to each Greenlander part of USA offer? If so, I can probably round up >50k Americans that would want that money, immigrate there, and then have us all vote to join USA. Problem solved. Pocket the money then come home 😆

How exactly are you getting 50k Americans to be able to live and have legal status in Greenland?
 
If there's any respect, its akin to that of a dog turd on the sideway and taking effort not to step in it.

Here's current status of countries accepting a "Board of Peace" invite, a real who's who.
  • Bahrain
  • Morocco
  • Argentina
  • Armenia
  • Azerbaijan
  • Belgium
  • Bulgaria
  • Egypt
  • Hungary
  • Indonesia
  • Jordan
  • Kazakhstan
  • Kosovo
  • Mongolia
  • Pakistan
  • Paraguay
  • Qatar
  • Saudi Arabia
  • Turkey
  • United Arab Emirates
  • Uzbekistan
Tell me, given that we already have a United Nations, what is the benefit of this board of peace other than fluffing trump's ego?
I cannot say as to the benefit of it, but holding up the UN as being effective at much of anything is a stretch.
 
I cannot say as to the benefit of it, but holding up the UN as being effective at much of anything is a stretch.

That's reasonable and I didn't speak to the effectiveness of the UN. Similarly, I wouldn't expect trump to be able to create an alternative that's more effective. What does he offer to differentiate?
 
Last edited:

Advertisement



Back
Top