Greenland

#501
#501
jmacvols1 said:
what is idiotic show Danish have no concern for Greenlanders?
Click to expand...

Yeah, just threaten to invade them some more.

2jWmqc.gif
 
#510
#510
jmacvols1 said:
we will see
Click to expand...

True. It doesn't appear right now anyone is interested, in the meantime he is destroying any type of trust with basically anyone for future arrangements anywhere. If his goal is to end NATO I think that might be possible though.

That is all I got, I'm just here for the ride.
 
#512
#512
LSU-SIU said:
True. It doesn't appear right now anyone is interested, in the meantime he is destroying any type of trust with basically anyone for future arrangements anywhere.
Click to expand...
Good. US needs to get out of all these organizations. I think it was George Washington who warned the US should never be involved in organizations as the UN et al for those organizations will not be concerned about what is in the best interest of the US...as Trump is.
 
#513
#513
jmacvols1 said:
Good. US needs to get out of all these organizations. I think it was George Washington who warned the US should never be involved in organizations as the UN et al for those organizations will not be concerned about what is in the best interest of the US...as Trump is.
Click to expand...

I have said getting out of UN and NATO are probably good ideas, but not sure about the rest of all this. I seriously doubt George Washington was talking about the UN.
 
#515
#515
LSU-SIU said:
I have said getting out of UN and NATO are probably good ideas, but not sure about the rest of all this. I seriously doubt George Washington was talking about the UN.
Click to expand...
organizations like the UN.



" It is our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliance with any portion of the foreign world. " GW
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
#517
#517
LSU-SIU said:
I guess he had a problem with the ratification of the U.S. Constitution then.
Click to expand...
The quote, "It is our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliances with any portion of the foreign world," comes from George Washington's Farewell Address, first published in September 1796 [1].

Your assumption that he had a problem with the ratification of the U.S. Constitution is incorrect. Washington fully supported the Constitution; in fact, he presided over the Constitutional Convention as its president and was subsequently elected as the first President of the United States under that very Constitution [1].

The Farewell Address was issued after the Constitution had been ratified and while he was completing his second term as president. His statement was not about domestic policy or the Constitution itself, but rather a piece of foreign policy advice to the young nation, urging future leaders to avoid entanglement in perpetual military alliances that could drag the U.S. into foreign wars [1]. This concept became a cornerstone of early American foreign policy known as isolationism or non-interventionism [1]. AI
 
  • Like
Reactions: 825VOL
#518
#518
jmacvols1 said:
The quote, "It is our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliances with any portion of the foreign world," comes from George Washington's Farewell Address, first published in September 1796 [1].

Your assumption that he had a problem with the ratification of the U.S. Constitution is incorrect. Washington fully supported the Constitution; in fact, he presided over the Constitutional Convention as its president and was subsequently elected as the first President of the United States under that very Constitution [1].

The Farewell Address was issued after the Constitution had been ratified and while he was completing his second term as president. His statement was not about domestic policy or the Constitution itself, but rather a piece of foreign policy advice to the young nation, urging future leaders to avoid entanglement in perpetual military alliances that could drag the U.S. into foreign wars [1]. This concept became a cornerstone of early American foreign policy known as isolationism or non-interventionism [1]. AI
Click to expand...

Well, did George talk about trying to start a war with everyone all at the same time and how that might turn out?

Are we bombing some more people tonight?
 
#520
#520
LSU-SIU said:
There are over $1t of known oil reserves...that does not include gas and minerals or fishing. It's 25% bigger than alaska.
Click to expand...
Taking away the cash, would a referendum settle it? My guess is 3/4 AND passing in the Danish parliament. Similar to Oregon people wanting to join with Idaho.

Plus a % of any money made on resources for some number of years - like The UK/Hong Kong lease.
 
#521
#521
If you believe what Trump says this is a done deal, The question is how? I think yesterday he said he would not allow Russia or China in Greenland. So the military option is very much on the table.
 
#525
#525
TVOLS said:
Right now, but what about in the future? We see how much influence they have in South America or trying to.
Click to expand...

There's zero threat of China or Russia invading any South American country either.

You're grasping at smoke trying to manufacturer justification for the US invading Greenland 'before anyone else', when it's actually Trump that has become fixated on imperialist expansion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EasternVol, tvolsfan and DuckInAPen
New Posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

Advertisement



Back
Top