MontyPython
Are you suggesting coconuts migrate?
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2019
- Messages
- 11,446
- Likes
- 14,792
Yes — the United States and Denmark do have an existing defense agreement that gives the U.S. broad military access to Greenland, though it’s not a full “sovereignty transfer” or unconditional U.S. ownership.
Here’s what that means:
Here’s what that means:
Existing Defense Agreement
- The U.S. and Denmark first signed a Defense of Greenland agreement in 1951 under NATO auspices.
- That treaty allows U.S. military forces to use facilities in Greenland (most notably Thule Air Base, now known as Pituffik Space Base) in the context of the defense of Greenland and the broader North Atlantic area, in cooperation with Denmark.
- It gives the U.S. forces free access and movement through Greenland territory by land, air, and sea for defense purposes, subject to Danish and NATO coordination. (United Nations Legal Affairs)
Current Access Under NATO Framework
- Because Greenland is part of the Kingdom of Denmark and Denmark is a NATO member, Article 5 of NATO’s collective defense applies — meaning an attack on Greenland would be treated as an attack on all NATO members, including the U.S.
- The 1951 agreement works within that NATO framework and is intended to facilitate combined defense cooperation rather than cede sovereignty. (United Nations Treaty Collection)
U.S. Military Presence
- The U.S. operates a major base (Pituffik) in Greenland under this defense framework.
- The Danish government has confirmed that existing arrangements “already give the United States wide access to Greenland” as part of mutual defense cooperation. (Business Insider)
Important Clarifications
- This agreement does not transfer sovereignty or give the U.S. ownership or control of Greenland. Greenland remains part of the Kingdom of Denmark, and decisions about its territory require Danish (and increasingly Greenlandic) consent.
- There is no separate agreement granting unfettered rights outside the defense context — and any expansion of U.S. access still requires Danish and Greenlandic approval. (GovInfo)
Context in Current Politics
- Recent political rhetoric (e.g., claims about U.S. wanting to “take over” Greenland) has brought attention to these defense ties, but the formal legal basis for U.S. presence remains the 1951 defense agreement and NATO cooperation, not a new treaty ceding control. (reuters.com)
