I'll say this much:
I'd much rather Mel Tucker than Kevin Steele
Ok Mrs Schiano calm down. No one is hiring that that barf bag Schiano.
Rutgers historically is better than the Schiano years.
In the worst conference he had one season he finished ranked.
28-48 in the worst major conference.
they had to bring in new players....fangio plays a completely different style of defense than tucker did in the NFL. guys like houston, young, mcphee, and acho didnt fit in tuckers system. they lost guys like peppers and briggs, etc. from tuckers defense to fangios because those guys didnt fit fangios defense. the talent level was the same...just different styles
He was terrible at Baylor as a HC and had issues with stress as a DC at Clemson. Does that sound like someone qualified to be a head coach?Why?
Steele at least played here and his resume is deeper than Tucker's.
I won't hold that he has HC experience against him in comparison with Tucker's near 0 experience. It was a long time ago and a learning experience. Even if it was bad at Baylor. No one was winning at Baylor then. He took over a team on an 8-25 stretch. He was just another brink in a 15 year wall of losing seasons there.
Outside of that he's been a part of multiple national titles and has been hired by 3 of the 10 greatest coaches in CFB history in Tom Osborne, Nick Saban and Bobby Bowden. He's also worked for Majors, Dabo and Les Miles. That's a lot of experience working for national championship coaches.
Now am I saying I want Steele? Not at all. But I'd take him over Tucker based on resume and VFL status.
The comments on him as an NFL coach make zero sense to me. Sure, his defense sucked in Chicago. But this isn't the NFL. This is college. Saban sucked in Miami and Spurrier sucked in Washington. Monte Kiffin is a defensive genius for his work with the Bucs, but wasn't very good in college.
It's a totally different game that utilizes different schemes, and you are dealing with grown men, not young men needing direction. Just because a guy didn't win big in the NFL doesn't mean he can't be successful in college ball. He is up for the Broyles award and that means something.
I'd still rather have Venerbles, but the "Mel Tucker is a bad hire because of his NFL track record" doesn't make sense to me.
Why?
Steele at least played here and his resume is deeper than Tucker's.
I won't hold that he has HC experience against him in comparison with Tucker's near 0 experience. It was a long time ago and a learning experience. Even if it was bad at Baylor. No one was winning at Baylor then. He took over a team on an 8-25 stretch. He was just another brink in a 15 year wall of losing seasons there.
Outside of that he's been a part of multiple national titles and has been hired by 3 of the 10 greatest coaches in CFB history in Tom Osborne, Nick Saban and Bobby Bowden. He's also worked for Majors, Dabo and Les Miles. That's a lot of experience working for national championship coaches.
Now am I saying I want Steele? Not at all. But I'd take him over Tucker based on resume and VFL status.
44% of his wins were OOC vs non power five opponents. Schiano's college resume is a polished turd. He had one remarkable year. Before and after that year Rutgers was mediocre at best.
I live in DFW...have for 22 years. I pull for the Cowboys and actually work as a contractor at their HQ. See Jerry and his kids every week, Nate Newton every day and fist bumped Dez last week. Yeah...Go Cowboys.![]()
Check out this article from 2013 about how Tucker would be a great college coach
Ask 5: Which NFL assistant would make best college coach? - NFL.com