NEO
Eat at Joe's
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2009
- Messages
- 19,754
- Likes
- 16,042
In theory I agree. But in practicality; it just ain’t working.
Just like in business, if you haven’t invested in the stock of a company, you can vote on the shareholder’s meeting.
Or in a more homespun analogy; if you want to partake in the pot luck; it is expected that you bring a dish.
My personal belief is that as soon as a citizen is eligible for the draft they are eligible to vote and exercise every right of adulthood.
Which is why I said we ought to simplify the tax code and get rid of all the ********. Make it a nice even, reasonable structure where everyone gets to chip in a reasonable amount (open for discussion), that way when you don't, it's not because you had kids or a medical expense. It's not so easy to just say "if you don't pay taxes..." right now because look at all you listed that reduces tax credit. There's too much confusing mess in the tax code.If you wanted to make it 18+ only counted for Congressional representation size requirements, then that is a reasonable argument. I think all is better but respect that.
To say that you arent included in Congressional representation size requirements because you paid 5-6 federal taxes but not income is silly. Or if you fought for the country and paid income taxes for decades but now you dont because you are on social security, etc. Or if you had a major medical expense one year and dont have to pay income taxes that year. Or lost a job that you had for 30 years..
I could go with your thinking.Oh, I completely agree with the sentiment.
If I had my way citizenship and the right to vote would be earned. I'd implement the Starship Troopers citizenship model but currently under our constitution we can't exclude entitlement takers from voting.
There is a reason the Roman Republic with its limited franchise lasted about 5 times longer than the Athenian Democracy.Oh, I completely agree with the sentiment.
If I had my way citizenship and the right to vote would be earned. I'd implement the Starship Troopers citizenship model but currently under our constitution we can't exclude entitlement takers from voting.
doesn't matter. they are still subject to the laws of this nation as a citizen. that gives them the right to vote. there should never, again, be a group of second class citizens.Pretty darn close to everything the government does requires payment of some kind.
The United States was designed with pretty strict limited franchise. Some of the exclusions were probably wrong. Some were 100% correct. Either way, we've democratized too much and these states signing electoral college pacts are missing the point.There is a reason the Roman Republic with its limited franchise lasted about 5 times longer than the Athenian Democracy.
The founding fathers took note of this.
Which is why I said we ought to simplify the tax code and get rid of all the ********. Make it a nice even, reasonable structure where everyone gets to chip in a reasonable amount (open for discussion), that way when you don't, it's not because you had kids or a medical expense. It's not so easy to just say "if you don't pay taxes..." right now because look at all you listed that reduces tax credit. There's too much confusing mess in the tax code.
We also need to get rid of social security and a bunch of the other crap, so of course this is a pie in the sky discussion. I believe there ought to be skin in the game to be represented, at least at the federal level. I think the Senate needs to go back to being elected by state governments, EOs need to be blown away, and more and more. But we're never going back and our country will die for democratizing and bloating out the government class.
does that potluck guarantee your rights? does the business? do either of those set the laws that control literally every facet of your life? or at least the potential to do so.In theory I agree. But in practicality; it just ain’t working.
Just like in business, if you haven’t invested in the stock of a company, you can vote on the shareholder’s meeting.
Or in a more homespun analogy; if you want to partake in the pot luck; it is expected that you bring a dish.
At this stage I don't particularly care if welfare recipients are second class citizens. Irresponsible people of all stripes are why we get stuck with the shitshow we keep getting stuck with, so why not limit the damage? People that are net drains on society should be limited until they straighten out as part of being wards of the state- let them be drug tested, searched, inspected, arms removed, etc. until they get themselves right. Either way too many people can vote as it stands today.doesn't matter. they are still subject to the laws of this nation as a citizen. that gives them the right to vote. there should never, again, be a group of second class citizens.
as I always I fully support the equality of ALL rights.
the Constitution never once considers tax paying towards what rights you have. well I guess beyond the legal support of taxation. there is no Constitutional justification for it. If you can own a gun, and have that right protected by the 2A, while on welfare, you also have the right to vote while on welfare. If you have property rights while on welfare, you have the right to vote. If you are protected against unlawful search and seizure, and everything else, while on welfare, you have the right to vote. anything else is disgusting.
Yup. The central compromise of the Constitutional Convention was the balance between proportional representation (the House) and equal representation by States (the Senate). The electoral college was a key part of the bargain. Without it; the small states would have never ratified the Constitution. As such, it is sort of like a prenuptial agreement IMO. You do away with the great compromise, you have effectively broken trust with the founding promise of our Union.The United States was designed with pretty strict limited franchise. Some of the exclusions were probably wrong. Some were 100% correct. Either way, we've democratized too much and these states signing electoral college pacts are missing the point.
doesn't matter. they are still subject to the laws of this nation as a citizen. that gives them the right to vote. there should never, again, be a group of second class citizens.
as I always I fully support the equality of ALL rights.
the Constitution never once considers tax paying towards what rights you have. well I guess beyond the legal support of taxation. there is no Constitutional justification for it. If you can own a gun, and have that right protected by the 2A, while on welfare, you also have the right to vote while on welfare. If you have property rights while on welfare, you have the right to vote. If you are protected against unlawful search and seizure, and everything else, while on welfare, you have the right to vote. anything else is disgusting.
no we don't.We apply this same logic to everything in life except voting. It just makes no logical sense.
In my youth, I would have agreed with your point. As I grow older, I keep realizing more and more that some people really shouldn’t be voting.does that potluck guarantee your rights? does the business? do either of those set the laws that control literally every facet of your life? or at least the potential to do so.
Guys in 1988 our national debt was 50 percent of GDP.
We are now well over 100 percent of GDP.
If you truly care about the future of this country and your children something has to change.
Guys in 1988 our national debt was 50 percent of GDP.
We are now well over 100 percent of GDP.
If you truly care about the future of this country and your children something has to change.
depending on what you are calling the end Athenian Democracy, there are huge number of reasons outside of the voting system that caused it to fall.There is a reason the Roman Republic with its limited franchise lasted about 5 times longer than the Athenian Democracy.
The founding fathers took note of this.
no we don't.
you have rights if you are on welfare. voting is a right.
my church, doesn't kick me out if I don't contribute to the tithe.
I can still walk into a store, and be subject to their rules and prices, even if I don't actually buy anything.
I still get pulled over by the cops even if I don't pay taxes.
the politician making decisions about my life whether I pay taxes or not.
