I'm gonna miss the game again today, but (regardless of the outcome, which, on paper, should be horrible) I'm most interested in seeing from whom the leadership comes today--if it comes.
Janiah has it in her, but her position/role limits the "reach" of whatever leadership she brings. Leadership from your point guard/distributor is ideal, but I would (whether as coach or in loco parentis) still want to limit Mia's exposure to contact against this Oklahoma team today.
For all Kim and her staff have done to rehabilitate, coach up, and develop our transfers, as young humans they each are still of two minds: irresolute and prone to self-doubt or self-criticism. They've been growing in grit* ...but not quickly enough to keep pace with the demands of this schedule.
What follows will be unfair and too much to ask, but (switching to a golf analogy) the best shot we could make from where the ball lies today would be if the freshmen made a pact among themselves to take over and put this team's destiny on their own shoulders. It might split the team. Older players might resent it, or be shamed by it. It might destroy this season. But the future would look immeasurably brighter for Lady Vol basketball if it happened.
I've read and given thought to all the critiques of CKC and her system, both here and elsewhere. I'm still not convinced by the arguments--and I won't be until I see her players, playing her system, for 4 quarters, and still get beat. In one and two-thirds seasons, that is something I've not yet seen. Wish I had higher hopes for today.
------
* Educators will tell you that they are seeing similar traits among the various cohorts who went through the COVID lockdown period, the severity depending on their age, home life, and lifestyle prior to the lockdown.
I also wonder about the psychology of players who would be most drawn to transferring into a "new" system. It may be that such a scenario attracts players who've blamed their circumstances for their underperformances with other teams, blaming coaches, chemistry, system, etc. rather than taking ownership of their play. IF there is a shared character/developmental flaw that is infecting this LV team, that might be it.
As a coach, you can't throw your players under the bus for their psychological makeup or emotional woundedness, but neither can you make their competitive world easier or less demanding. All I can see that's positive--for the team, the program, but also for the individual players to whom you've committed your time and heart--is to keep making them face the hard reality that they must learn to own their attitude and their commitment. That's not just for the season or the prorgram, but for the rest of their lives if they're going to experience success when it really matters.
To do otherwise would be malpractice for an educator--and IMHO coaches are the highest practicioners of being an educator.