because we would owe him a butt load of money. Unless we lose lose 8 games this season, i don't see him getting fired because of the financial hole it would put us in.If we lose to florida, georgia and alabama this year...he's gone. I don't see how you could justify keeping him around. I just don't see it.
It's just giving the media something after the game. Nothing more should be looked into it than that
I don't care whether he's fine with a loss like this or not. We just lost on the road to a bad Pac-10 team that was 6-7 last year and playing with at best their 3rd string QB. They lost to Notre Dame last year, for chrissakes. Any team that has any designs on making noise in the SEC this year has to go in there and KILL this team.
It was pathetic. Our offense was pathetic. We've never been good at making halftime adjustments under Fulmer, but I'd hoped that things would be different under Clawson. Apparently not.
What do you people expect him to actually say?
Do you want him to bawl in front of the camera and beg for UT's forgiveness?
Do you want that he gets angry and does a johnny cash for a nice poster?
Or how bout just hang is head and say, we'll we're just bad?
Post-game quotes are nothing but relating to the media. He's not going to say how angry, ashamed, or frustrated he is. He's just going to try to set a good image for the university and get out of there as soon as he can. Believe me, the players hear a lot worse than "this team has character and toughness".....they'll hear a lot worse than I can probably type on this board and it's not good print to represent the university either. He wants to win, he wants the team to get better....but you can't say anything bad/realistic/not-positive in front of the media because then it becomes a black eye for the university or an image of UT hiring a coach who has no faith in players at all
It's just giving the media something after the game. Nothing more should be looked into it than that
Wrong. You can react differently. I'm not yet (give me 10 minutes or so) calling for Fulmer's head...but really? UCLA...not CAL...but UCLA, are you serious? (I am taking into account the fact that UCLA was a seriously weakened team)
because we would owe him a butt load of money. Unless we lose lose 8 games this season, i don't see him getting fired because of the financial hole it would put us in.
But you can't say that to the media, you just can't. You're repping the university in the same way that player's off-campus activities represent the school positively or negatively as well
Of course you can't say that to the media. I understand that he has to go out there an mouth platitudes to the microphones. Which is why, of all the Vol fans in the world, the last one whose opinion I'm interested in right now is Coach Fulmer's.
It is absolutely, utterly flabbergasting to me that we allow a quarterback who threw FOUR INTERCEPTIONS IN THE FIRST HALF to sit back in the pocket and pick our defense apart in the second half while only rarely bringing any sort of pressure. That absolutely falls on the head of Chavis, and I fail to see how anyone could argue otherwise. We played like a poorly coached, ill prepared team - just like Michigan vs. Appy State last year, which cost Lloyd Carr his job; before anyone jumps on me, I would gladly take last year's Appy State team straight up over this year's UCLA team.