**ORANGEBLOOD**
CALL THE MAN!
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2007
- Messages
- 3,908
- Likes
- 8
Chris low said on sports talk this morning, that if Fulmer wins the sec he will be expecting an extension and a raise, and said it could get "ugly" if he does not. What does everyone think of those apples?
Chris low said on sports talk this morning, that if Fulmer wins the sec he will be expecting an extension and a raise, and said it could get "ugly" if he does not. What does everyone think of those apples?
If he wins the SEC outright and takes us to a BCS bowl (and wins) give the man a raise and extension.
If he takes us to the SEC champ game and we lose, and win our bowl game then let him be.
If we go to the SEC champ game lose, and then lose the bowl game... then that is a 5 loss season and Mr. Fulmer needs to be asked nicely to do what is best for our football program and step down.
Compensation should be based on merit. Winning the SEC will almost offset the embarrassment we received in Gainesville and Tuscaloosa. But looking at the body of work for the year, even if we win the SEC, I don't think it merits an extension, and only a token raise at most. He's already making > $2 million a year. Only winning another national title should increase that figure materially.
Compensation should be based on merit. Winning the SEC will almost offset the embarrassment we received in Gainesville and Tuscaloosa. But looking at the body of work for the year, even if we win the SEC, I don't think it merits an extension, and only a token raise at most. He's already making > $2 million a year. Only winning another national title should increase that figure materially.
Compensation should be based on merit. Winning the SEC will almost offset the embarrassment we received in Gainesville and Tuscaloosa. But looking at the body of work for the year, even if we win the SEC, I don't think it merits an extension, and only a token raise at most. He's already making > $2 million a year. Only winning another national title should increase that figure materially.
Compensation should be based on merit. Winning the SEC will almost offset the embarrassment we received in Gainesville and Tuscaloosa. But looking at the body of work for the year, even if we win the SEC, I don't think it merits an extension, and only a token raise at most. He's already making > $2 million a year. Only winning another national title should increase that figure materially.
It's a sad day when Vol fans are talking about giving a guy a raise because he goes 10-4 and losing the SEC Championship game after several sub par seasons. At Tennessee, you are expected to win 10 games a year and anything less is an underacheivement. He needs several seasons of being at the top again before he gets more money or an extension. Just because bama is stupid and willing to pay a guy 4 million a year to win 7 or 8 games, we don't have to.
Chris low said on sports talk this morning, that if Fulmer wins the sec he will be expecting an extension and a raise, and said it could get "ugly" if he does not. What does everyone think of those apples?