NashVol11
Gloomed to Fail
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2009
- Messages
- 21,101
- Likes
- 7,204
Remember that Josh Dobbs and his family requested a redshirt also.. That factored in also. More dynamics involved here..
No facts, no proof, no logic will ever slow the "shoulda been Dobbs" crowd down.
The large majority of Vol fans are enjoying the ride and thankful Dobbs is a gamer. But there will always be some that will only see yet another reason to whine and moan.
I could pretend to be shocked but I would be lying.
I'm still "wait and see" on Jones gameday but it has nothing to do with the never ending revisionist b.s. about the old qb situation.
I agree there. Some players are lights out in practice (remember Crompton) and some aren't spectacular in practice but when the lights come on it's a different story (Matt Jones at Arky).
No, it doesn't. Any coach dumb enough to sacrifice wins to "save" a player's eligibility is not a smart coach.
That was my entire point. If Jones redshirted Dobbs, it was because he thought Worley gave us the best chance to win at the time, not because he thought Dobbs did but wanted to save him for later.
That was my entire point. If Jones redshirted Dobbs, it was because he thought Worley gave us the best chance to win at the time, not because he thought Dobbs did but wanted to save him for later.
It's your theory...wish you was good at stuff so you could think for the Vols...but you're not...but you're not. :no:
He knew Dobbs had potential. But needed a little more time. Look how much better he is after working spring and fall camp.
So it was a combination of multiple things.
I have zero issue with him redshirting Dobbs.
It's my theory that coaches are trying to win games. It's ReaderVol's theory that Jones was looking five years down the road when he may not even be here then, that Jones thought he was good enough to still have this job in 2018 but also didn't think he was good enough to recruit another QB by then, and that our coach decided to redshirt the guy he thought was the best player on our team, at the most important position, essentially not even really trying to beat Florida in 2014. Which theory makes more sense?
It's my theory that coaches are trying to win games. It's ReaderVol's theory that Jones was looking five years down the road when he may not even be here then, that Jones thought he was good enough to still have this job in 2018 but also didn't think he was good enough to recruit another QB by then, and that our coach decided to redshirt the guy he thought was the best player on our team, at the most important position, essentially not even really trying to beat Florida in 2014. Which theory makes more sense?
So you agree with me. He would have been redshirted because he wasn't ready, not because he was ready but we wanted to hide him from everyone. If it were the latter, I'd have a huge problem with it, as should everyone, which was my point.
He didn't sacrifice wins. They lost games. Wins aren't a decision. You would know that...if you hadn't failed to be our coach. :sad:
I swear people can't read. Suppose someone said, "I think Butch lost to Alabama on purpose last year. He wanted to let them get cocky before coming back to beat them this year." And I said, "That's really dumb. No coach would do that, including Butch." How is calling a hypothetical stupid, and saying the coach would NOT do it, an example of me questioning the coach?
Hard to follow...so Butch "sacrificed a win" but it's stupid to take that literally? :huh: You're on a higher plane of thinking than us...so take five and let us catch up.