Now that I'm not trying to type this out on mobile and I've had some time to think about it, allow me to retort further.
When are you going to give up playing the victim and race card when it comes to this administration? Each and every time someone criticizes Obama he becomes a victim in your eyes. And you only have one, ONE instance of where he was publicly called out. And Joe Wilson apologized afterwards. Now what about the other two individuals on the Democratic side that immediately followed his outburst by stating he should be thrown out? Is it not disrespectful to speak out at such a public function even if it is in response to someone else? But you give them a pass and instead focus on the man who was overcome by emotions and apologized almost immediately.
IM NOT SAYING EVERY CRITICISM MAKES HIM A VICTIM. IVE CRITICIZED HIM HERE. BUT THERE IS THIS UNMISTAKABLE SHRILLNESS IN SOME OF THE ATTACKS ON HIM.
I'D ASK YOU TO YHINK ABOUT WHERE THAT IS COMING FROM, AND TO ALSO CONSIDER SOME OF THE SIMILARITIES WITHIN IT.
So much for your victim card. Now let's look at the times Obama has done much the same:
He criticizes the Supreme Court, not only in front of other national leaders at a summit, but in front of our nation during the State of the Union.
HE DIDNT CALL THEM NAMES.
He criticizes business owners by telling them "you didn't build that."
COME ON, HE SAID A WEE BIT MORE THAN THAT. WHAT HE SAID IS CORRECT, WHICH IS THAT FOR ALL THEIR COMPLAINING ABOUT GOVERNMENT THEY SURE SEEMED HAPPY TO ACCEPT:loco: ROADS, INCENTIVES, ETC, ALL COMING FROM THE GOVERNMENT.
He allowed his own White House staff to exclude a press agency (Fox) before the remainder of the news agencies cried foul.
NOT SURE THEY COUNT AS PRESS BUT OKAY.
He called the Cambridge Police department "stupid."
THAT WAS OUT OF LINE, I AGREE.
He called Fox News "destructive."
THIS IS CORRECT. AND DOESNT EQUATE TO THE TORRENT OF NAMES THEY THROW AT HIM WEEKLY.
How about when Senator Obama called Bush a "leadership failure" for requesting the debt ceiling be raised. The same debt ceiling that has been raised how many times under his watch?
THAT PHRASE IS BLAH BLAH BLAH.
And did it again when he claimed Bush tried to hide behind Executive Privilege and something was "a little shaky" when he himself used it to mask documents in the Fast and Furious case.
FAST AND FURIOUS WAS A BUSH PROGRAM.
How about calling out Congress for going on vacation for the Holidays when he himself was on vacation in Hawaii?
NOT SURE WHEN THAT HAPPENED.
And these are things he was personally responsible for save possibly the exclusion of Fox News.
He's such a victim for certain.
Your posts here can be boiled down to two things:
A: It wasn't directly his decision (IRS, Benghazi, Fast and Furious, etc)
FAST AND FURIOUS WAS A BUSH PROGRAM.
HE DID NOT ATTACK BENGHAZI.
THE IRS PROTOCOL WAS PUT IN BY A REPUBLICAN ADMINISTRATOR.
YOU NEED BETTER SCANDALS, THE OLD ONES ARE PLAYED OUT.
B: Is nothing more than a ultra right wing conspiracy to discredit him because he is black. (Anything that conservatives disagree with him on)
YOU MEAN FOX? MEH, THEY ARE JUST PARROTING THEIR VIEWERSHIP.
And your posts defending his actions have become like a bad comedy to read since they are so predictable. When do you have the man stand on his own merits and not be the victim? When will you actually stop using excuses and actually look at things objectively?
When will your own poison stop when speaking of candidates on the right side of the aisle?
I DIDNT SAY ANYTHING POISONOUS ABOUT ROMNEY. I SAID I WAS FINE IF MCCAIN HAD WON. IF YOU ARE REFERRING TO GADFLIES LIKE PALIN, MY DEFENSE IS THAT EVEN REPUBLICANS RECOGNIZE SHES AN IDIOT.
There's an old saying about glass houses you know.