BanditVol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2012
- Messages
- 4,921
- Likes
- 3,785
The problem wasn't firing Fulmer. The problem was hiring Kiffin to replace him. Instead of the decision being based on the qualifications of the HC it was based primarily on him bringing an all-star recruiting staff and his dad on staff. Even if he hadn't bolted after one year they'd probably had us on probation if he stayed.
But the way things were declining under Fulmer, if we kept him we could've enjoy a lot of 5 to 7 win seasons, just like we did without him.
It wasn't all just that we hired Kiffin. It was the way Fulmer was fired. He could have been eased out like Bowden at FSU. That worked much better for them.
And I don't agree with your 5 to 7 wins statement. I think even in 2009 Fulmer could have had 8 or 9 wins, and by 2010 Tajh Boyd would have been ready to step in and who knows what would have happened?