One of the issues raised by the community leaders and protestors was their distrust of the local authorities. The additional autopsy by the DOJ and their promise to keep an eye on the investigation addresses those concerns.
So basically if the local authorities (specifically the grand jury at this point) take the evidence and see no good reason to go to trial everyone is gonna walk away satisfied because Holder come down from DC and restored trust? Is it that easy? "Hey Mr. President, Im not sure I can trust the local authorities here in ________, can you send the AG in?
Hey, it works both ways. It seems to me that one of the main things that has slowed down the Brown supporters/police bashers is the fact that the autopsy results show he was not shot in the back. This is important for many obvious reasons, not the least of which is that it immediately calls into question the accuracy of the friend's description of what occurred.
True. At this point however the discussion has changed from "he got shot in the back while running away" to "6 shots? 2 in the head?". I believe it will move to something else later on.
Can you imagine what would have happened had only the local autopsy been done, showing no shots in the back? The rioters would be claiming that it was faked, a cover-up. With DOJ doing one, with Baden doing one, and showing the same thing, it just gets us all past at least the one side-show issue.
And, as I say, it makes you question the friend's account, since he is evidently objectively proven wrong by this result. Holder going down there buttresses the fact of oversight from the outside, and removes just one more issue from the dispassionate and reasoned approach that must be taken to the evidence as it emerges.