If he can prove that the company won't function well without him and it jeopardize jobs the government will let him off with paying the said monies back with the standard interest rate. What was the reason he was reappointed to CEO/President?
Under normal circumstances I'd agree with you....CEO's are like football players and coaches, nothing more than 'guns for hire'........ but this is different...its his family's business...they started the company...
Again in more 'normal' circumstances as a last ditch effort to salvage the company a corporation would merely cut off the head (CEO) and bring in a team to change the culture....its not that easy in this case....
It's a corporation, not a mom and pop operation. It is set up to keep on running regardless of who is in charge. The fact that he stepped away from it once already shows that it can operate without him. The feds are building their case against Haslam and will be looking to bring major charges against him. This is not light stuff here. They might be looking to put him away for the rest of his life after seeing how bad the people with the plea bargains got it.
Yeah, that's not how the law works at all. The company can run without him. It hasn't been said why he came back, but I have a feeling it has to do with what is going on and that the CEO that was relieved of his duties became aware of the fraud and wanted no part of it.
Taking down haslam will have little effect on the economy and unemployment. Again, he is replaceable.It's not the law no. but a company I deal with owed 7 million in payroll taxes and they got off with just paying a 1000$ a month for 5 years. The government wants the unemployment number to drop not increase. More ppl making money the more they make. They will bend the laws to what they want if you haven't noticed yet. Benghazi cough cough..
