GetYouSomeofThat
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2017
- Messages
- 4,494
- Likes
- 5,558
I not only realized it...it was explained to me in 1968 when I was being recruited to play for Coach Bryant at Alabama. Envelopes stuffed with cash slipped under your dorm room door. A little classier than a McDonald's bag I suppose. "Full compensation" is a meaningless term. Who decides what is "Full"..??
My point is simply that the EDUCATION and other benefits our athletes receive isn't "Nothing". I apologize if that came across as a bit harsh, that wasn't my intent. It's a bit of a sore point with me when I hear college football players wondering why they have to go to classes when they're only there ( college) to get ready for the NFL.
I agree they should attend classes...however it is a sore point for me when people get upset that the players are finally allowed to enjoiy the fruits of their labor.
Why should they not be compensated at a market level or forced to work for less than their value? And they are doing this while those around them benefit greatly from their efforts.
Worth the time to read or find the podcast regarding the same topic
Would Paying College Players Really Destroy Competitive Balance? - Freakonomics