Rasputin_Vol
"Slava Ukraina"
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2007
- Messages
- 71,940
- Likes
- 39,732
"leading"... "prime"... seems like you are being difficult and trying to split hairs.
So it's more important to get a "big name" than a good coach?
"leading"... "prime"... seems like you are being difficult and trying to split hairs.
Generally Big Names are good coaches. You do not become an NFL HC or OC/DC by being bad at what you do. They are better at Xs and Os then Kelly I guarantee you that and Kelly is a joke at recruiting. Kelly equals disaster. Historically, NFL guys can recruit when they come down to College based on the NFL name they bring with them. And Xs and Os wise again if they survived in the NFL they are better at Xs and Os and making guys better than 90 percent of the guys in college.
you mean i wasted my morning for that news!!!!!!!!!Hire the coach when the best one is available and you know that for certain Hamilton. We can still land recruits if you wait until the very end of bowl season..
Al Grph, Bill Callahan, Dave Wanstedt, Charlie Weis...
Agree. "Leading" singles out a candidate, "prime" does not.
Words mean things.
I can't believe we're doing this...but I still think that the words "the prime" candidate mean the same as "the leading." Instead, he said "a prime," which means "a leading" candidate. It seems to me that the key difference is the use of the word "a" over the word "the."
Yes, thank you for proving my point those guys are all good recruiters. Weis do I have to prove this, Wanstedt has the most talent in the Big East will beat Cincy next week and go to BCS. Callahan recruited well was bringing talent back to Nebraska, he cannot coach D and lost his team. He is an offensive genius period--he should be an OC though is not the kind of leader to be HC.
Al Groh is doing a great job, so are you trying to prove me wrong or helping me out?
