Dormady's playing time.

Go ahead and google...1996 combine...it won't tell you anything. I was just out of the AF and poring over the combine that year...he was a man among boys in I-AA...if he had run a 4-4 or faster, San Francisco wouldn't have gotten him...he'd have been a first rounder (they picked JJ Stokes)... Doesn't matter, he always outran others ON THE FIELD. Years of self-involvement and practicing in shorts prolly helped his midlife 40. :)






4.7 tho. :)

Wille Gault at 48 years old in 2009 is all that needs to be discussed. Amazing!

Willie Gault is still racing around at 48 - NFL - Yahoo Sports

Compare that to Gault, who can still crack 10 seconds in the 100-yard dash, and last year ran the 40 in a blistering 4.27. Age-grading track and field tables suggest that his recent 10.80 for the 100 meters at 48 is the equivalent of 9.76 by a man in his 20s – only a step behind Usain Bolt, and fast enough for a silver medal at the Beijing Olympics.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Go ahead and google...1996 combine...it won't tell you anything. I was just out of the AF and poring over the combine that year...he was a man among boys in I-AA...if he had run a 4-4 or faster, San Francisco wouldn't have gotten him...he'd have been a first rounder (they picked JJ Stokes)... Doesn't matter, he always outran others ON THE FIELD. Years of self-involvement and practicing in shorts prolly helped his midlife 40. :)

So you have no proof of a 4.7 just a 20 year memory? Since TO ran a combine time of 4.45 at age 38 (after two knee surgeries) chances are he ran faster then that out of college wouldn't you think? SF got TO in the 3rd round because he was a flake and played at UTC not because he ran a 4.7.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
I would much rather see him slinging it on mop up duty just in case he is actually needed.
Well yeah I didn't mean that I don't want him to throw any. What I meant was I only hope that Dobbs stays healthy and we won't need Dormady to start any this season. I only want to see him playing when we have secured the win.

I'm not big on the idea of having to start a true freshman at QB in the SEC with our O-Line
 
It's beneficial to have Dobbs behind this OL rather than Dormady. A freshman QB needs to be behind a solid veteran OL.
 
Go ahead and google...1996 combine...it won't tell you anything. I was just out of the AF and poring over the combine that year...he was a man among boys in I-AA...if he had run a 4-4 or faster, San Francisco wouldn't have gotten him...he'd have been a first rounder (they picked JJ Stokes)... Doesn't matter, he always outran others ON THE FIELD. Years of self-involvement and practicing in shorts prolly helped his midlife 40. :)

So you have no proof of a 4.7 just a 20 year memory? Since TO ran a combine time of 4.45 at age 38 (after two knee surgeries) chances are he ran faster then that out of college wouldn't you think? SF got TO in the 3rd round because he was a flake and played at UTC not because he ran a 4.7.

He ran a 4.7 tho...he didn't get the "flake" stigma until his 3rd year in Frisco... Don't know the science of this ESPN Combine either...he runs a 4.3 you'd think he'd be playing huh? It's perplexing that you can't just Google old combine 40s...if I had an ESPN Insiders account I could pull up his 1996 Draft profile, but I don't want to make Bristol even richer for a link...also read his 40 time in that year's draft guide and several articles since. If I had known that an unknown poster would doubt me 19 years in the future...I'da kept em. :)
 
It's beneficial to have Dobbs behind this OL rather than Dormady. A freshman QB needs to be behind a solid veteran OL.

That's the disturbing part we are fairly veteran just not solid. Hopefully we'll see improvement once all the positions get settled.
 
He ran a 4.7 tho...he didn't get the "flake" stigma until his 3rd year in Frisco... Don't know the science of this ESPN Combine either...he runs a 4.3 you'd think he'd be playing huh? It's perplexing that you can't just Google old combine 40s...if I had an ESPN Insiders account I could pull up his 1996 Draft profile, but I don't want to make Bristol even richer for a link...also read his 40 time in that year's draft guide and several articles since. If I had known that an unknown poster would doubt me 19 years in the future...I'da kept em. :)

Oh my God someone doubted you. Bow to you my Lord. You just can't admit you are wrong. By all accounts TO ran a 4.23 in the 1996 combine though I'm not buying it I think it's certainly closer then 4.7. He runs a 4.3 40 you would think he would be playing? What are you even talking about.? I didn't say TO ran a 4.3 now did I? I know you don't know the science of the ESPN combine because in reality you don't know **** but you act like you do.

Now quit riding my ball sack.
 
Last edited:
Oh my God someone doubted you. Bow to you my Lord. You just can't admit you are wrong. By all accounts TO ran a 4.23 in the 1996 draft though I'm not buying it I think it's certainly closer then 4.7. He runs a 4.3 40 you would think he would be playing? What are you even talking about.? I didn't say TO ran a 4.3 now did I? I know you don't know the science of the ESPN combine because in reality you don't know **** but you act like you do.

Now quit riding my ball sack.

"By all accounts" provide a link to his 40 time...at the 96 combine! Or I'll even peruse this grandiose tale of a 4.2 by Chester Festerenstein...it's simple...I read 4.7 in his draft guide and the Goose Gosselin DMN draft preview. A valid 4.2 would have gotten him into the first round...even if he came out of Devry! Steve McNair played great in I-AA AND threw well at the combine...first rounder. I'm not sure why your "ball sack" is hanging out but I was already on this thread...you started arguing with ME over a 40 time I remembered. If you can't keep your clothes on you'd probably best not navigate these message boards...accidents could be problematic. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
The "sack" in question couldn't have been all that impressive. Nobody else even noticed.
 
I'm so excited to finally have a few talented QB's. Hopefully we only need Dobbs but good to know he is backed up by real talent.
 
"By all accounts" provide a link to his 40 time...at the 96 combine! Or I'll even peruse this grandiose tale of a 4.2 by Chester Festerenstein...it's simple...I read 4.7 in his draft guide and the Goose Gosselin DMN draft preview. A valid 4.2 would have gotten him into the first round...even if he came out of Devry! Steve McNair played great in I-AA AND threw well at the combine...first rounder. I'm not sure why your "ball sack" is hanging out but I was already on this thread...you started arguing with ME over a 40 time I remembered. If you can't keep your clothes on you'd probably best not navigate these message boards...accidents could be problematic. :)

I think I said I didn't buy the 4.23 didn't I Richard? You have followed me around like a lost puppy for weeks now. Whats the fascination? Low hangers or just not a damn thing to do in Elm Hill? First of the month will be here soon enough and the mailman will run I promise. Just relax and wait for it.

While you are waiting.....


Looking Back: Terrell Owens
"I was just feeling really good that day and thought I'd see how far along I'd come," Owens said following his sensational 40-yard-dash, electronically clocked in a record 4.19 seconds at a speed camp in Berkeley, CA, on what is considered a "slow track". Owens, who broke his own record for the track of 4.33 seconds set several months earlier, had recently defeated rookie 49ers wide receiver Michael Jennings, a former Florida State track star, in an impromptu 40-yard-dash in Osaka, Japan. He decided the time was right to see just how fast he had become.

Owens had trained hard all off-season long in both 2001 and 2002, putting primary focus on improving his speed.

"It's not that I wasn't already fast," said Owens, "It's just that I knew I could get much faster if I really concentrated my efforts on improving the performance of my fast-twitch muscle fibers. I'd already come a long way, but I could really feel my body starting to change into one that could do special things from an explosion standpoint, so I decided to see how far I could take it."

The results were breathtaking, as Owens followed up his awk-inspiring display in defeating an elite track athlete by running what is believed to be the fastest legitimate 40-yard-dash time in NFL history.

"To be honest, I thought I could have run a little better," said Owens afterward, "I had run a 4.33 on this track immediately following the 2001 season, and that was against the wind, and Mike (Jennings) had been hand-timed in the 4.19 to 4.21 range before, so I thought I had a chance at getting under 4.1. But I ain't complaining."

Since Owens's run in 2002, no athlete has run better than 4.39 on this surface.
 
Last edited:
I think I said I didn't buy the 4.23 didn't I Richard?

You "think you said"? Losing touch...Mortimer? :). Just reach into your big bad internet and get me a valid time ...no speculation or "must have beens because of this's" and I'll abandon my memory of it. Not sure why you've let this upset you so much... I made a general comment about a player's (not Dormady's) combine 40 and you're all a kilter...I'm here to help...Phillip. :)
 

Advertisement



Back
Top