yes i agree. It kinda feels like a good brickmason laying a great foundation but does not know how the outlook of the rest of the building will be. Why do i feel like this is going to be Dave Clawson all over again.
you mean the Clawson that was so bad he got a D-I HC gig after leaving UT?
the process produces wins. It's not a difficult concept to me
IMO, he's talking about process because it wouldn't be very popular to blurt out the truth and say, "We're probably going to struggle in the near term due to the coaching transition and lack of talent, so we need to be focused on doing things right so that the wins will come later."you might be missing my point- i might not be making it well: when our coach says that "wins are simply a byproduct of the process," then what is the actual goal of the process? the process itself? if the goal is winning, then winning is not a byproduct.
It's more like a builder saying, "The only thing that matters is getting the walls up!" without ever having an architect draw up some plans. I like the good foundation and process approach. The bricks need to be in the right place, or even if you get something built, it's not going to last.yes i agree. It kinda feels like a good brickmason laying a great foundation but does not know how the outlook of the rest of the building will be. Why do i feel like this is going to be Dave Clawson all over again.
you might be missing my point- i might not be making it well: when our coach says that "wins are simply a byproduct of the process," then what is the actual goal of the process? the process itself? if the goal is winning, then winning is not a byproduct.
IMO, he's talking about process because it wouldn't be very popular to blurt out the truth and say, "We're probably going to struggle in the near term due to the coaching transition and lack of talent, so we need to be focused on doing things right so that the wins will come later."
It's all just talk until we see how this team competes and how this staff recruits with a whole year to work with.
Next year is going to be rough, would have also been rough with Kiffin here. Douglas would still be messed up and the rest of the o-line and d-line and qbs would be the same as now.
Setting a culture of hard work, discipline and physical football is the most important thing Dooley can do at this point. Wins will be hard to come by regardless who the coach is next year so might as well get the system set-up and start building on that. If he's successful the wins will start coming in 2011 and after.
Obviously y'all don't listen to a whole lot of Nick Saban interviews because everything that Dooley said is taken verbatim from previous Savan statements. I can't remember who the interviewer was, (possibly finebaum), but he was asking Mrs. Saban about being married to CNS and he said something along the lines of "if sex was as much as a process as his coaching, then you'd never have children." Dooley is just straight out of the Saban philosphy of coaching. It's not fun or glamorous, but I really think that we'll see some results in a couple of years.
For Nick Saban, The Process Finally Has an End in Sight | Bleacher Report
I understand the OP's point in the sense that he could say more about why this/his/Saban's process will produce wins. In the end from what I've read though DD's about the product not the marketing so we'll have to hope his product sells itself! All I care about is if the players buy in, that's what matters now until UT-Martin.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
good analogy about the mason. i don't think, however, this situation is comparable to clawson.
what i do think is that we are really going to have to be patient with this coach if he's going to be successful- unlike kiffin who would've been successful really quickly.
