whobethis16
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2010
- Messages
- 6,373
- Likes
- 3,271
He blew it by starting out like he did every year slow,if he had started like we finished we could've been a 4 seed and maybe got into a easy bracket and made it 2 the elite 8 at leastSweet 16 is blowing it? And obviously you weren't around in Martin's first year because there were plenty of people that were very vocal about firing him around this time in his first season.
Sweet 16 is blowing it? And obviously you weren't around in Martin's first year because there were plenty of people that were very vocal about firing him around this time in his first season.
Iirc it was the 8th game in when he lost to Austin Peay.Over exaggerate much....there were people that had doubts about whether Zo could get it done but there was only one calling for his head and that poster was ridiculed daily for a yr and half bc of it....I am definitely not confident that we hired the right guy and it's his job to prove us wrong.
Sweet 16 is blowing it? And obviously you weren't around in Martin's first year because there were plenty of people that were very vocal about firing him around this time in his first season.
He blew it by starting out like he did every year slow,if he had started like we finished we could've been a 4 seed and maybe got into a easy bracket and made it 2 the elite 8 at least
The point of college basketball is to play well in the tournament. When UCONN won the entire thing as an 8 seed do you think the fans cared that they under achieved? UT was one play away from the elite 8. UT's best player had the ball in his hands with a chance to win the game. That's all you can ask for in the tournament.
The point of college basketball is to play well in the tournament. When UCONN won the entire thing as an 8 seed do you think the fans cared that they under achieved? UT was one play away from the elite 8. UT's best player had the ball in his hands with a chance to win the game. That's all you can ask for in the tournament.
This guy has it much harder than Zo did too....not only is good portion still want la Bruce back....a smaller very vocal part of the fan base is all about some Zo and judging by attendance the other night he may not have much support starting out..
CCM had to replace a terminated icon that was loved by majority of the fan base while the same majority wanted CCM fired, yet you feel CDT has it harder than Zo?
And of course you wouldn't. Just saying, you're 10x worse than I was with Zo, I at least would criticize on occasion, you're appalled at such a thought, Tyndall is like a mixture of Fergie and Jesus in your mind.
He wins some. Probably on par with CCM after 3 years.
He was one of my favorite players at Purdue, and I like his coaching style.
Martin and Tyndall have nothing to do with one another. Tyndall should be given at least 4 years to mold UT basketball to his vision. No use second guessing what happened in the past. Whining about how Martin was treated isn't going to change the fact that Tyndall is the coach right now. If he can get out of this NCAA thing without a huge amount of damage, I think he can win and win big at UT. He's changing the entire style of play at UT (similar to what Martin had to do) and he has some miss matched parts and had to do some emergency recruiting. What you're seeing on the court right now is not the product Tyndall is capable of putting on the court.