TennFan0027
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2008
- Messages
- 414
- Likes
- 23
If the coaches were smart, and that seems to be a bigger IF each week, they would start Stephens and then sub in Crompton. JC's mindset has to be a little fragile and I don't think he will be greeted with the best applause once he is announced with the starting unit at the stadium. Why not let Stephens start, UT hopefully score, and then bring in JC. The crowd will not be as bitter with points on the board once he knocks out a cheerleader on his first out route.
If the coaches were smart, and that seems to be a bigger IF each week, they would start Stephens and then sub in Crompton. JC's mindset has to be a little fragile and I don't think he will be greeted with the best applause once he is announced with the starting unit at the stadium. Why not let Stephens start, UT hopefully score, and then bring in JC. The crowd will not be as bitter with points on the board once he knocks out a cheerleader on his first out route.
I don't understand why Crompton should be put back in if Stephens actually scores. Spurrier is the only coach I have ever seen that can rotate quarterbacks successfully. It's never worked when Fulmer's done it before. If Stephens is doing well, leave him in.
I don't understand why Crompton should be put back in if Stephens actually scores. Spurrier is the only coach I have ever seen that can rotate quarterbacks successfully. It's never worked when Fulmer's done it before. If Stephens is doing well, leave him in.