We have never measured the qbs success by drives. We aren't going to start now.
LOL... Really? Who put you in charge? Yes. QB's have ALWAYS been measured by drives, ability to lead an O, the ability to put points on the board, and ultimately by wins.
Your risk averse hero was so safe that he was ineffective at doing ALL of those things.
The numbers don't lie. He did provide an initial spark when he came in. Hasn't been good since. If he can actually make it through a few games or even a game then we can see if he can recapture that first quarter magic.
In the 3 games Maurer started, JG finished the game. Those games then make the best comparison of the two.
Maurer stats: 55% completion, 382 yards, 2 TD's, 4 INT's (including a handoff by Jennings), 16.6 yds/completion, and 9.1 yds/att.
JG stats: 50% completion, 175 yds, 1 TD, no INT's, 12.5 yds/completion, and 6.25 yds/att.
Common opponent. Same supporting cast. Same gameplan. That's as close of a comparison as you can get. What does it prove? EXACTLY what we've told you repeatedly. JG is hyper risk averse and it makes him ineffective even as the "stats" don't look bad.... until you look at yards and points.
One guy takes risks but produces yards. The other guy doesn't take risks... and produced much less.
My point isn't that Maurer is a sure thing or a finished product. His numbers don't prove that yet. He's a freshman though with unknown upside.
The point is that JG is a 4th year player. He is what he is... and he's at best comparable to a true freshman or in reality not as good.