Sal was "stronly suggested" by Hart. Our back 4 is dragging down our whole D. Our front 7 has played pretty good and consistent, especially with banged up lb's. Our scheme has had to be compensated so much for the lack of play in our secondary that they're having to use the front 7 to plug the holes in the dam instead of turning them loose. Our DB's simply weren't very good athletes coming in and they haven't developed. DB's were a problem under Wilcox and they're a bigger problem now with new DC and scheme.
I think Dooley was told before the season that if he won the games he was supposed to and either had an October upset or atleast kept those games close for 60 minutes, then won a bowl that he was safe. There was no internal expectation to compete for SEC east, your in the 3rd year of building out from what was essentially a 3 year deficit (2007-2009 classes bombed out), and building for 2014 and beyond to compete for Atlanta. Most of the pressure from Dooley is coming from outside the program, boosters, etc. Why not make the drastic changes that needed to be made, coaches, schemes, etc.
Pre-season most of us thought 7-5 or 8-4 for a reason, and now people are upset for a team that is in-line with expectations. Truth is we're alot closer than most of our fans can see. A cousin who played HS ball with a 2 1/2 year UT starter and was a 1-AA All-Conference, All-American at DE and had 3 sacks, 2 blocked kicks against an SEC team watched Bama and SC with me and agreed that the defense was lacking talent and the scheme was mostly on point. We have maybe 2 SEC calibur DB's, it takes recruiting cycles, we're almost there.
UT fans need to decide, do they want instant gratification and be Auburn in 2014 or do they want to compete to play Alabama or LSU in Atlanta in 2014-2015 and beyond.