VolinDawgland
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2008
- Messages
- 2,864
- Likes
- 0
Huh? The 2001 team was immensely talented and very deserving to play for the SEC title. That team should have been 12-0 and in the Rose bowl playing Miami for the NC.
The 1999 season was a prime example of complacency by the staff. A national champion almost losing to Memphis on its home field? Impressive.
2002 was another fine example of complacency. Injuries yes, but we lost every big game of the season, Arkansas win is debatable.
Where are 2006, 2007 and 2008? Kind of shoot some holes in your argument don't they?
Go back and reread what you wrote above and explain again why fulmer did such a bang up job the past 10 years, you're shooting yourself in the foot. 2004 was the only year we overachieved, and that was greatly facilitated by the fact we were facing Zook and Shula.
For me those back to back ugly losses to ACC powerhouses Clemson and Maryland (sarcasm font is on) was more the Fulmer legacy after the great run ended in 1998. Those two losses told you everything you needed to know about where this program was heading. There were some false positive indicators and some exciting games, but the program in general was on a down slide from 2000 on. Unfortunately a program like ours that really needed to do something special for an extended period to cement a reputation as a top tier program could not get it done in 1999 or 2001 when the opportunity was there. 1998 looks more like a blip then a great run.
