It's usually some of both.
We probably improved a significant amount from game 1 to game 2; most teams do, most players do.
But we were also playing a much easier opponent.
So: both.
Here's hoping our lads keep climbing the improvement ladder quick enough get the drop on Florida in two more weeks.
Go Vols!
I want to be optimistic about this team's defensive improvement from the WV game to ETSU. The Vols tackled better and they were in better position to make plays. Real improvement, or just vastly inferior opponent?
Anyone else think Kirkland looks to finally be back ? West Virginia was embarrassing but he did have 10 tackles and last night I thought he looked really goodImproved, but not greatly. And the level of competition had a lot to do with it for sure. But I like how both Tuttle and Golden are playing on the inside and I absolutely love Bryce Thompson at corner, I think he’s gonna be special here.
We had one sack, Mars Hill (liberal arts school) had three.I mentioned in another thread earlier today it is a little scary to me young Gooden led the D in tackles with 8 but I could not find Tuttle, Bennett, or Phillips with 4 or more. That has to be cleaned up quickly to compete with UF. Let's not forget the gators were in that ball game with UK until the very end which they should not have been. We need our DL starters to become significant when the lights come on, not disappear.
They are the worst team in the BCS. They might score 13 but they will not win. As I’m sure CJP is not taking any team lightly and that’s all that matters. I can take them lightly all I want and it doesn’t mean squat to the outcomeUTEP, small as their DL is, they look like they can score points. Lots of them. Take them too lightly and it might backfire.