if you have to debate the merits of a hire based upon the definition of "indication" and "regular" then you have already lost.
Regular patterns can have any time between them as long as the duration is constant.... Like the Iceages occur in a regular pattern.
Aren't you a lawyer?
You can do better than this!
Yes!!!!! CBJ has worked too hard the last couple of years building this thing up. If he were to hire an OC that would want complete control to run "his" offense, his plan would most likely take a step back. The way you keep moving forward is you stay on the same path. I don't think Debord is the long-term answer, so debating very far into the future is futile. CBJ is looking at these next 2 years as being extremely pivotal in his time here and establishing something. You can't risk one of those 2 years installing a new system.
Derek Dooley smells what Butch is cooking...Can't wait to hear butch get roasted at the presser when he has to field the questions he is gonna get. How can you be "comfortable" hiring someone who has never run this type of offense, and hasn't recruited an athlete since the Internet. Way to go Butch.
Sorry buddy, I didn't write the dictionary. You asked a question, I answered. Most of us know what "regular" attendance means. I just try to educate the masses. Call it "Pro bono" work if you will.
You deflect real information with meaningless banter and skepticism, when you have nothing proving otherwise. You are reaching.