Death and Harm

#26
#26
37L1 said:
When the person's right to exist is ended by another entity without that person's consent.

How would you feel about this esoteric discussion, if it wasn't esoteric but real? How about I came over to where you are and make you cease to exist, no harm, or pun, intended.

This is ridiculous.
Click to expand...

So, when the other person is non-existent, that is when they are harmed?

Would you like my address?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#27
#27
therealUT said:
So, when the other person is non-existent, that is when they are harmed?

Would you like my address?
Click to expand...

No, making you cease to exist would be doing you a favor. I cause more harm by not making you non-existent.

Good luck, chasing your own tail. :hi:
 
#28
#28
therealUT said:
When I die, I cease to exist. If I don't exist, I can't be harmed. That is, existence is a necessary condition of being harmed.

So, if I'm alive at moment one and dead at moment two such that there are no moments between moment one and moment two, at what moment does the harm occur?
Click to expand...

At the precise moment the ass kickin' starts
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#35
#35
therealUT said:
That's really the only way I don't want to be killed. Shoot me, stab me, burn me, drown me. But, blunt force trauma? No ****ing thank you.
Click to expand...

I guess it would depend on how intense and severe it is. If it's bad enough you'd never know what hit you.
 
#39
#39
At the moment life ceases... no more harm to that individual. No life to harm. Pain, trauma etc before the end... those are the harm. The want for the pain to stop,the suffering to end can be said to be the cause of the suffering.

Would proximate harm be to those who cared for the now deceased? They are harmed by the death of someone they were close to?
 
#42
#42
Omar V Tinko said:
At the moment life ceases... no more harm to that individual. No life to harm. Pain, trauma etc before the end... those are the harm. The want for the pain to stop,the suffering to end can be said to be the cause of the suffering.

Would proximate harm be to those who cared for the now deceased? They are harmed by the death of someone they were close to?
Click to expand...

This is how I see it.
 
#43
#43
therealUT said:
That's got to be a really big mother ****er swinging that pipe.
Click to expand...

Velocity at impact and region of the brain would be more significant than the size of the person swinging. Lower occipital for Cerebellar/medulla impact would be best, i think.
 
#44
#44
McDad said:
Velocity at impact and region of the brain would be more significant than the size of the person swinging. Lower occipital for Cerebellar/medulla impact would be best, i think.
Click to expand...

I have no brain to hit.
 
#46
#46
therealUT said:
When I die, I cease to exist. If I don't exist, I can't be harmed. That is, existence is a necessary condition of being harmed.

So, if I'm alive at moment one and dead at moment two such that there are no moments between moment one and moment two, at what moment does the harm occur?
Click to expand...

Your postulation is not plausible.
 
#48
#48
therealUT said:
When I die, I cease to exist. If I don't exist, I can't be harmed. That is, existence is a necessary condition of being harmed.

So, if I'm alive at moment one and dead at moment two such that there are no moments between moment one and moment two, at what moment does the harm occur?
Click to expand...

Drink a beer and get l$id
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
New Posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

Advertisement



Back
Top