Dear Donald

Check out any board of directors for a major company. The only stock holders with any influence are the rich ones. The rich make each other richer and convince each other that it's all appropriate and justifiable - age old story.
I think that they should only appoint people who are broke to serve on the boards. They have proven that they can make good decisions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
Check out any board of directors for a major company. The only stock holders with any influence are the rich ones. The rich make each other richer and convince each other that it's all appropriate and justifiable - age old story.

Go get rich then instead of complaining about success.

Why should the rich pay a higher percentage of their income in taxes while the poor take from society without putting nothing in.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
I think that they should only appoint people who are broke to serve on the boards. They have proven that they can make good decisions.

Might not be a bad idea. The country is obviously willing to go with an off the wall idea in order to blow up the system.
 
Have you heard of austerity. Single payer would plunge us into bankruptcy.

As soon as the reality of the massive debt comes around, we won't be able to afford entitlements, medical, social security, or even infrastructure.

And? I'm not sure what this has to do with what I posted.
 
I think that they should only appoint people who are broke to serve on the boards. They have proven that they can make good decisions.

I think you are on to something, if we require corporations to only appoint poor people, we'll all be poor and equal.
 
Check out any board of directors for a major company. The only stock holders with any influence are the rich ones. The rich make each other richer and convince each other that it's all appropriate and justifiable - age old story.

Do you have a 401K? IRA?
 
Like Single Payer,and wealth redistribution.

Wealth has been continually redistributed throughout history. Look at the wealth redistribution over the past 50 years (identify the trend) and tell me you think it's a good thing.
 
I thought you hated the past 8.

I was never bothered financially, nor under Bush. Obama did F millions with Obamacare though.

Obama also set back race relations 50 years along with being an apologetic ***** internationally.

This is about Donald though. We had years to rightfully point out Obama's faults. Now it's your turn.
 
I was never bothered financially, nor under Bush. Obama did F millions with Obamacare though.

Obama also set back race relations 50 years along with being an apologetic ***** internationally.

This is about Donald though. We had years to rightfully point out Obama's faults. Now it's your turn.

From what I've seen the first month, that will be like shooting fish in a barrel.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
I was never bothered financially, nor under Bush. Obama did F millions with Obamacare though.

Obama also set back race relations 50 years along with being an apologetic ***** internationally.

This is about Donald though. We had years to rightfully point out Obama's faults. Now it's your turn.

So I guess Trump set it back 200 years.

When people say Obama "set back race relations" it really means they had to confront their and society's racism and are uncomfortable with it being addressed. Race relations were not good 50 years ago. Stop with the revisionist history.

China has already made Trump their B++++. He is also Russia's b*&**. Trump is worse by any measure.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
I was never bothered financially, nor under Bush. Obama did F millions with Obamacare though.

Obama also set back race relations 50 years along with being an apologetic ***** internationally.

This is about Donald though. We had years to rightfully point out Obama's faults. Now it's your turn.

Not everyone was fortunate to "not be bothered financially" under Bush.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
So I guess Trump set it back 200 years.

When people say Obama "set back race relations" it really means they had to confront their and society's racism and are uncomfortable with it being addressed. Race relations were not good 50 years ago. Stop with the revisionist history.

China has already made Trump their B++++. He is also Russia's b*&**. Trump is worse by any measure.

When you say others are uncomfortable with "It (race) being addressed" you really mean you're the second most racist person on this board behind D4H, which is just a drunk you anyway.

You refuse to accept facts in regard to race. That's not my problem. That's yours. I seriously doubt anyone here is uncomfortable talking about race outside of you.

Obama handled race poorly. He injected race where it was unnecessary. Injected himself when it was unnecessary. He handled situations very, very poorly. You can at least admit to that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
When you say others are uncomfortable with "It (race) being addressed" you really mean you're the second most racist person on this board behind D4H, which is just a drunk you anyway.

You refuse to accept facts in regard to race. That's not my problem. That's yours. I seriously doubt anyone here is uncomfortable talking about race outside of you.

Obama handled race poorly. He injected race where it was unnecessary. Injected himself when it was unnecessary. He handled situations very, very poorly. You can at least admit to that.
All that he will admit to is you are a racist, and not down with the struggle.
 
When you say others are uncomfortable with "It (race) being addressed" you really mean you're the second most racist person on this board behind D4H, which is just a drunk you anyway.

You refuse to accept facts in regard to race. That's not my problem. That's yours. I seriously doubt anyone here is uncomfortable talking about race outside of you.

Obama handled race poorly. He injected race where it was unnecessary. Injected himself when it was unnecessary. He handled situations very, very poorly. You can at least admit to that.

To no one's surprise, I think Obama did a fantastic job in advancing race relations. The problem is that he advanced them more and at a faster rate than some people could tolerate. Obama took the nation 3 steps forward and Trump has taken the nation one step back (and counting). The end result will be what the nation as a whole is able to process. Some people just have to move more slowly than others.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
To no one's surprise, I think Obama did a fantastic job in advancing race relations. The problem is that he advanced them more and at a faster rate than some people could tolerate. Obama took the nation 3 steps forward and Trump has taken the nation one step back (and counting). The end result will be what the nation as a whole is able to process. Some people just have to move more slowly than others.

Of course you believe that. Obama is black. To you no black person can do wrong, unless they think for themselves of course.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person

Advertisement



Back
Top