DownTheField
VN Big Wig
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2009
- Messages
- 6,441
- Likes
- 5,867
Is there a consensus on why Thompson left? I have heard CMM's influence, DT style of coaching, DT's style of play, tension between DT and Thompsonrelated to coaching job at MTSU.
I'd settle for an educated guess.
I was a nineteen year old recruit once. You wouldn't believe the name calling from the drill sergeants.
2 pts and 2 assists per game while being benched isn't a great freshman year in my book but good luck to him.
Surely you're not implying that we're better off without him. He's no John Stockton, but he was looking like a very serviceable player. He came in as a freshman, played a major role for the team, and often outplayed a 5th-year veteran. Is 2/2 a flashy stat line? No. Are points and assists the only two things he ever contributed? No.
Surely you're not implying that we're better off without him. He's no John Stockton, but he was looking like a very serviceable player. He came in as a freshman, played a major role for the team, and often outplayed a 5th-year veteran. Is 2/2 a flashy stat line? No. Are points and assists the only two things he ever contributed? No.
Rebounds? Defense? Playmaking? Breaking down the D? Shooting? Breaking the press?
Tell me what he did that made his freshman year a great one.
And to be honest, his subpar year was due to Martin. DT has some skills, but wasn't allowed to use them and had no intensity on the floor. Walking it up with no pressure and getting 10 second calls sums it up. Stokes is down pinning his man, only to look back at DT walking around and looking at Martin for a ****ty play call.
Surely you're not implying that we're better off without him. He's no John Stockton, but he was looking like a very serviceable player. He came in as a freshman, played a major role for the team, and often outplayed a 5th-year veteran. Is 2/2 a flashy stat line? No. Are points and assists the only two things he ever contributed? No.
Difference is those drill sergeants had been in your shoes and gone through that same training. Their name-calling was because they knew it was for your own good. Everyone on here is just calling him a hack because their feelings are hurt that he chose another school, not because it will help him out in the future. This is just immature bitterness on the part of the VN boards.
How many of us have had to deal with a coach leaving our college basketball program and know what DThomp is going through? Oh None? Good to know.
I took it as a reference to DT's goodbye tweet that he had had a great freshman year, with Sparty lamenting that DT had never been used or coached properly as a player.
Lots of 'infers' in there.Essentially, it hurts to lose our only semblance of a PG, but it's not like we lost the second coming of CJ Watson. The kid was decent as a freshman and his court vision was his biggest strength, but he had a long way to go in nearly every other department to become a difference-maker at PG.
In the end, was his available talent worth the hassle when you consider the dramatics with his father, his obvious preference for CCM, and his alleged dislike for Tyndall's "in your face" approach? That's something we may not know for several years, but right now, I think you can argue it's 50-50 at best. CDT needs guys who are 100% committed, and I don't think anyone can argue that Thompson was.