Catbone
Hit me baby one more time
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2010
- Messages
- 67,183
- Likes
- 65,031
I absolutely understand quite a few folks in VolNation do not like name-only thread titles.
What I don't understand is, why?
A name alone is not troubling...it doesn't mean something bad happened to the player...it doesn't mean something good happened, either. It has no value, positive or negative. It is simply a statement: I'm gonna be talking about this guy, this player.
So why is it troubling for so many? Put differently, why do so many automatically assume the worst...that the thread is going to have bad news?
Is there some VolNation history behind this? Some series of bad-news threads that all had name-only titles?
Just wondering. Would love to hear from the folks who are actually bothered by name-only titles.
p.s. Go, Curt! Cheering for you, man!
I absolutely understand quite a few folks in VolNation do not like name-only thread titles.
What I don't understand is, why?
A name alone is not troubling...it doesn't mean something bad happened to the player...it doesn't mean something good happened, either. It has no value, positive or negative. It is simply a statement: I'm gonna be talking about this guy, this player.
So why is it troubling for so many? Put differently, why do so many automatically assume the worst...that the thread is going to have bad news?
Is there some VolNation history behind this? Some series of bad-news threads that all had name-only titles?
Just wondering. Would love to hear from the folks who are actually bothered by name-only titles.
p.s. Go, Curt! Cheering for you, man!
It stems from the butthurt police like the two posters whining about it above. They have nothing better to do with their life so they complain about stupid stuff like that and they're the same people that love to brag about the fact they're adding you to the ignore list so their safe space on volnation will stay intact.