Even sadder that you think he's getting anywhere near the White House again
You'd have to have your head buried in the sand to not think he has at least a 50/50 shot at it. Look at any polling data. And any incumbent, sub 40% approval, is ripe for the taking. Just ask the last one.
I was clearly wrong in that assessment. Do you feel better? Not sure what that has to do with the current situation in Ukraine, but that's cool if it makes you feel better
I find it pitiful that you're actually chasing posts to THINK you're proving a point. It's laughable that you're so hypersensitive and thin skinned that you need to do it. You're another one with a huge chip on your shoulder.It has nothing to do with Ukraine. I'm just highlighting a long history of hypocrisy and bad takes consistent with the leftists on the board.
I find it pitiful that you're actually chasing posts to THINK you're proving a point. It's laughable that you're so hypersensitive and thin skinned that you need to do it. You're another one with a huge chip on your shoulder.
No. I am responding directly and specifically to their post. There are terms like distinction and nuance that matter. You try to conflate a myriad of unconnected issues with your aspersions. "You were wrong on that issue. You're a hypocrite and sanctimonious", is a weak, unintelligent and an uninformed take. That you're looking for someone to be wrong on any issue is pitiful since you never address the relevant topic with any detail as to why you disagree. You simply, AND dumbly, try to make it about identity politics. Especially when your response includes, "you are leftist", without the first damn clue as to what you're talking about.Lol. Isn't that what you're doing when you scold posters?
No. I am responding directly and specifically to their post. There are terms like distinction and nuance that matter. You try to conflate a myriad of unconnected issues with your aspersions. "You were wrong on that issue. You're a hypocrite and sanctimonious", is a weak, unintelligent and an uninformed take. That you're looking for someone to be wrong on any issue is pitiful since you never address the relevant topic with any detail as to why you disagree. You simply, AND dumbly, try to make it about identity politics. Especially when your response includes, "you are leftist", without the first damn clue as to what you're talking about.
That last comment is why you are obsessed with an unhealthy desire to prove me wrong and cast ignorant, fabricated aspersions towards me. There are a lot of people smarter than me in these forums. You, though, aren't one of them. BTW, I am not screaming anything. I just type, most of the time with a smile on my face when responding to dumbed downed rubes like you. Not only do you have a boulder on your shoulder, you have an inferiority complex that triggers you to seek fault with those for whom you envyYou don't address the topic many times. You just scream at the internet calling the person an idiot, Trump hack, etc. What is hilarious is you always saying it's the other person that's a moron while your take should be accepted as one of a seasoned vet who is an expert in many fields.
That last comment is why you are obsessed with an unhealthy desire to prove me wrong and cast ignorant, fabricated aspersions towards me. There are a lot of people smarter than me in these forums. You, though, aren't one of them. BTW, I am not screaming anything. I just type, most of the time with a smile on my face when responding to dumbed downed rubes like you. Not only do you have a boulder on your shoulder, you have an inferiority complex that triggers you to seek fault with those for whom you envy
I will never have to be sharpened again compared to you. You managed to grab an extremely small sample size and once again, cast your aspersions with it. Rather ignorantly as usual. Thanks for redundantly proving my point concerning you. For you, it's still about your disdain for some of my posts. It's all about identity politics with you, along with a chunk on your shoulderYou aren't the sharpest knife in the toolbox are you? I started with you because many you respond to you call an idiot, moron, uninformed, Trump hack, etc for an opinion. I noticed the same pattern in your posts to attempt to demean posters with counter arguments. You almost never make original posts. You wait to pounce.
You did the same to volfanhill on the football board. He made a point somewhat in defense of Heupel yet you told him he was clueless and Heupel knows more than him. He had to correct you nicely and you somewhat apologized when you realized he was agreeing with you. That is basic reading comprehension.
Your other common angle is in an elitist fashion is how well off you are and insulated from the argument you are ranting on about.
I don't respond a lot because I'm not sitting on the board all day following the arguments. I have a career that I spend extra time on and parent responsibilities.
Finally, I think you're more than likely a good person. I don't carry frustration from these posts from day to day. However, I do think you're not quite the independent you try to portray.
I will never have to be sharpened again compared to you. You managed to grab an extremely small sample size and once again, cast your aspersions with it. Rather ignorantly as usual. Thanks for redundantly proving my point concerning you. For you, it's still about your disdain for some of my posts. It's all about identity politics with you, along with a chunk on your shoulder
A handful of posts out of 11,000+. You're right it's not a small sample. That's no sample by statistical standards. It's not exponentially a pattern by statistical standards. You didn't know that and you're in supply chain management? You won't get out of that middle management role any time soon.Well at least part of your first sentence is correct.
Small sample size? Yeah, ok.
No, I don't get into identity politics. It's what has caused rifts with me and segments I long thought the same way with.
I'm not sure what you're talking about with your last sentence; however, my issue is how you attempt to shame people and belittle their opinions. So I can tell you that then see a good post from you and give you a "like". It's not personal.
A handful of posts out of 11,000+. You're right it's not a small sample. That's no sample by statistical standards. It's not exponentially a pattern by statistical standards. You didn't know that and you're in supply chain management? You won't get out of that middle management role any time soon.
"No I don't get into identity politics"It's ALL you do in this forum. Your responses to posts almost ALWAYS are nothing but identity politics. You use the term leftists quite often in any original post or response. Apparently you don't know the meaning of that term either. You never provide any detailed subject matter on a subject to support your opinion. There's actually is a pattern on you.
I know you're a good dude. I really don't care if you're limited intellectually
I thought you told me you were awhile back. My bad. Doesn't change the numbers
Let's stop. You don't care for my style and I don't care for yours. It's ok