Court Orders Dissolution of Trump Org

Even sadder that you think he's getting anywhere near the White House again

A long history of bad takes posted as fact.


You'd have to have your head buried in the sand to not think he has at least a 50/50 shot at it. Look at any polling data. And any incumbent, sub 40% approval, is ripe for the taking. Just ask the last one.

Solid.
 
  • Like
Reactions: norrislakevol
I was clearly wrong in that assessment. Do you feel better? Not sure what that has to do with the current situation in Ukraine, but that's cool if it makes you feel better

It has nothing to do with Ukraine. I'm just highlighting a long history of hypocrisy and bad takes consistent with the leftists on the board.
 
It has nothing to do with Ukraine. I'm just highlighting a long history of hypocrisy and bad takes consistent with the leftists on the board.
I find it pitiful that you're actually chasing posts to THINK you're proving a point. It's laughable that you're so hypersensitive and thin skinned that you need to do it. You're another one with a huge chip on your shoulder.
 
I find it pitiful that you're actually chasing posts to THINK you're proving a point. It's laughable that you're so hypersensitive and thin skinned that you need to do it. You're another one with a huge chip on your shoulder.

I'm not chasing your posts. I have noticed a pattern though. I actually found those posts when I was bumping in that old thread.
 
I'm not chasing your posts. I have noticed a pattern though. I actually found those posts when I was bumping in that old thread.
That you acknowledge you THINK you see a pattern is pitiful too. It's unhealthy to devote time and effort only to cast aspersions to other people.
 
Lol. Isn't that what you're doing when you scold posters?
No. I am responding directly and specifically to their post. There are terms like distinction and nuance that matter. You try to conflate a myriad of unconnected issues with your aspersions. "You were wrong on that issue. You're a hypocrite and sanctimonious", is a weak, unintelligent and an uninformed take. That you're looking for someone to be wrong on any issue is pitiful since you never address the relevant topic with any detail as to why you disagree. You simply, AND dumbly, try to make it about identity politics. Especially when your response includes, "you are leftist", without the first damn clue as to what you're talking about.
 
No. I am responding directly and specifically to their post. There are terms like distinction and nuance that matter. You try to conflate a myriad of unconnected issues with your aspersions. "You were wrong on that issue. You're a hypocrite and sanctimonious", is a weak, unintelligent and an uninformed take. That you're looking for someone to be wrong on any issue is pitiful since you never address the relevant topic with any detail as to why you disagree. You simply, AND dumbly, try to make it about identity politics. Especially when your response includes, "you are leftist", without the first damn clue as to what you're talking about.

You don't address the topic many times. You just scream at the internet calling the person an idiot, Trump hack, etc. What is hilarious is you always saying it's the other person that's a moron while your take should be accepted as one of a seasoned vet who is an expert in many fields.
 
You don't address the topic many times. You just scream at the internet calling the person an idiot, Trump hack, etc. What is hilarious is you always saying it's the other person that's a moron while your take should be accepted as one of a seasoned vet who is an expert in many fields.
That last comment is why you are obsessed with an unhealthy desire to prove me wrong and cast ignorant, fabricated aspersions towards me. There are a lot of people smarter than me in these forums. You, though, aren't one of them. BTW, I am not screaming anything. I just type, most of the time with a smile on my face when responding to dumbed downed rubes like you. Not only do you have a boulder on your shoulder, you have an inferiority complex that triggers you to seek fault with those for whom you envy
 
That last comment is why you are obsessed with an unhealthy desire to prove me wrong and cast ignorant, fabricated aspersions towards me. There are a lot of people smarter than me in these forums. You, though, aren't one of them. BTW, I am not screaming anything. I just type, most of the time with a smile on my face when responding to dumbed downed rubes like you. Not only do you have a boulder on your shoulder, you have an inferiority complex that triggers you to seek fault with those for whom you envy

You aren't the sharpest knife in the toolbox are you? I started with you because many you respond to you call an idiot, moron, uninformed, Trump hack, etc for an opinion. I noticed the same pattern in your posts to attempt to demean posters with counter arguments. You almost never make original posts. You wait to pounce.

You did the same to volfanhill on the football board. He made a point somewhat in defense of Heupel yet you told him he was clueless and Heupel knows more than him. He had to correct you nicely and you somewhat apologized when you realized he was agreeing with you. That is basic reading comprehension.

Your other common angle is in an elitist fashion is how well off you are and insulated from the argument you are ranting on about.

I don't respond a lot because I'm not sitting on the board all day following the arguments. I have a career that I spend extra time on and parent responsibilities.

Finally, I think you're more than likely a good person. I don't carry frustration from these posts from day to day. However, I do think you're not quite the independent you try to portray.
 
You aren't the sharpest knife in the toolbox are you? I started with you because many you respond to you call an idiot, moron, uninformed, Trump hack, etc for an opinion. I noticed the same pattern in your posts to attempt to demean posters with counter arguments. You almost never make original posts. You wait to pounce.

You did the same to volfanhill on the football board. He made a point somewhat in defense of Heupel yet you told him he was clueless and Heupel knows more than him. He had to correct you nicely and you somewhat apologized when you realized he was agreeing with you. That is basic reading comprehension.

Your other common angle is in an elitist fashion is how well off you are and insulated from the argument you are ranting on about.

I don't respond a lot because I'm not sitting on the board all day following the arguments. I have a career that I spend extra time on and parent responsibilities.

Finally, I think you're more than likely a good person. I don't carry frustration from these posts from day to day. However, I do think you're not quite the independent you try to portray.
I will never have to be sharpened again compared to you. You managed to grab an extremely small sample size and once again, cast your aspersions with it. Rather ignorantly as usual. Thanks for redundantly proving my point concerning you. For you, it's still about your disdain for some of my posts. It's all about identity politics with you, along with a chunk on your shoulder
 
I will never have to be sharpened again compared to you. You managed to grab an extremely small sample size and once again, cast your aspersions with it. Rather ignorantly as usual. Thanks for redundantly proving my point concerning you. For you, it's still about your disdain for some of my posts. It's all about identity politics with you, along with a chunk on your shoulder

Well at least part of your first sentence is correct.

Small sample size? Yeah, ok.

No, I don't get into identity politics. It's what has caused rifts with me and segments I long thought the same way with.

I'm not sure what you're talking about with your last sentence; however, my issue is how you attempt to shame people and belittle their opinions. So I can tell you that then see a good post from you and give you a "like". It's not personal.
 
Well at least part of your first sentence is correct.

Small sample size? Yeah, ok.

No, I don't get into identity politics. It's what has caused rifts with me and segments I long thought the same way with.

I'm not sure what you're talking about with your last sentence; however, my issue is how you attempt to shame people and belittle their opinions. So I can tell you that then see a good post from you and give you a "like". It's not personal.
A handful of posts out of 11,000+. You're right it's not a small sample. That's no sample by statistical standards. It's not exponentially a pattern by statistical standards. You didn't know that and you're in supply chain management? You won't get out of that middle management role any time soon.

"No I don't get into identity politics"🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 It's ALL you do in this forum. Your responses to posts almost ALWAYS are nothing but identity politics. You use the term leftists quite often in any original post or response. Apparently you don't know the meaning of that term either. You never provide any detailed subject matter on a subject to support your opinion. There's actually is a pattern on you.

I know you're a good dude. I really don't care if you're limited intellectually
 
A handful of posts out of 11,000+. You're right it's not a small sample. That's no sample by statistical standards. It's not exponentially a pattern by statistical standards. You didn't know that and you're in supply chain management? You won't get out of that middle management role any time soon.

"No I don't get into identity politics"🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 It's ALL you do in this forum. Your responses to posts almost ALWAYS are nothing but identity politics. You use the term leftists quite often in any original post or response. Apparently you don't know the meaning of that term either. You never provide any detailed subject matter on a subject to support your opinion. There's actually is a pattern on you.

I know you're a good dude. I really don't care if you're limited intellectually

If I'm in supply chain then you must be gay.
 
I thought you told me you were awhile back. My bad. Doesn't change the numbers

Let's stop. You don't care for my style and I don't care for yours. It's ok

Fair.

I could have hinted that it's one of many groups I work with since my role is in a function on the business side currently.

Ras used to think I was in HR.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BernardKingGOAT
Rush Limbaugh was right...anything the Dems accuse you of they are already guilty of it...

The Dems falsely accused Trump of fraud yet we find Fat Tish, Shifty Schiff now a third Dem committing MTG fraud..



Pulte
@pulte
4h

U.S. Federal Housing FHFA, alleges in a Criminal Referral to the Department of Justice that Federal Reserve Governor, Lisa D. Cook, committed mortgage fraud by designating her out of state condo as her primary residence, just two weeks after taking a loan on her Michigan home where she also declared it as her primary residence.When someone commits mortgage fraud, they undermine the faith and integrity of our System.It does not matter who you are - no one is above the law. We have sent a Criminal Referral to the Department of Justice with regard to the allegations against Ms. Cook, and the DOJ should go wherever the facts may lead them.
 
Last edited:
Advertisement

Back
Top