justingroves
13-14 in handshakes
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2007
- Messages
- 26,819
- Likes
- 28
You are giving pro examples. If a QB makes to the show, they're not dog meat. Every QB you mentioned had decent careers. The one yet to be seen is Skelton. He played pretty good at times last year. I'm partial to him as he is my cousin, for full disclosure.
I have 15 years as a HS DCoordinator in. Trust me. The QB matters. I would rather scheme a game plan designed to shut down 1 great receiver than a great QB with 3 average to good ones. All I would do is put robber coverage on him, have my FS cheat his way, and I shut his ass down.
Some of us just want to come on here and read about what is going on without having to see negative crap from some of the people on here. An occasional negative comment is okay but the non-stop action of some of these guys gets to be a little too much and takes the fun out of it for the rest of us. I haven't put you on my ignore list because you don't fall into that category. You defend negavols' right to be obnoxious but you slam anyone who wants to declare that they have placed them in their ignore list. I'm just asking for you to be consistent in your free speech convictions.If it makes you happy, do it. Where did I threaten you? I didn't.
Skelton, Kolb, Kitna, and Carr have had decent careers? They are backup qbs.
Demeytrius Thomas is a college example at Gtech. They ran the option.
Brandon Marshall at UCF is another example.
Bray can't manage the run game and we had no deep threat. UGA saw this and completely shut him down. That won't work on Hunter, if it was that simple, then coaches would completely shut down top recievers with bad qbs.
Skelton, Kolb, Kitna, and Carr have had decent careers? They are backup qbs.
Demeytrius Thomas is a college example at Gtech. They ran the option.
Brandon Marshall at UCF is another example.
Bray can't manage the run game and we had no deep threat. UGA saw this and completely shut him down. That won't work on Hunter, if it was that simple, then coaches would completely shut down top recievers with bad qbs.
Some guy created a topic on the Main Board for all of college football recruiting declaring his wife was a "MB10." Meaning she was a 10 on a scale of 1-10. This is an almost impossible task (Mila Kunis would only be a 7-8, just for comparison.)Thanks, my friend. Fill me in on the story, pls.
Some of us just want to come on here and read about what is going on without having to see negative crap from some of the people on here. An occasional negative comment is okay but the non-stop action of some of these guys gets to be a little too much and takes the fun out of it for the rest of us. I haven't put you on my ignore list because you don't fall into that category. You defend negavols' right to be obnoxious but you slam anyone who wants to declare that they have placed them in their ignore list. I'm just asking for you to be consistent in your free speech convictions.
So the QB matters, by your own admission?
When did I say the qb doesn't matter? All the recievers I named had better stats with a better qb, but they all had over 1000 yards with below average qbs. The difference was about 200 yards.
Calvin Johnson had his best year with Matt Stafford as qb, but he also had great years without him.
It doesn't matter about the qb. Of course Bray is going to be way more successful than Simms and Worley, but Hunter would have gotten 100 yards in a lot of games with or without Bray. Simms and Worley would have easily gotten Hunter tha ball.
Some guy created a topic on the Main Board for all of college football recruiting declaring his wife was a "MB10." Meaning she was a 10 on a scale of 1-10. This is an almost impossible task (Mila Kunis would only be a 7-8, just for comparison.)
The guy refused to give any proof to back his statement up, so people who I can only deem as 40-year-old virgins in their mom's basement with nothing better to do acquired his e-mail, phone number, pictures of his wife, etc, and proceeded to post everything. Wife turned out to not really be a looker, got roasted, and no one has seen him since.
Best excuse Dooley's ever made imo iyam jmo
When did I say the qb doesn't matter? All the recievers I named had better stats with a better qb, but they all had over 1000 yards with below average qbs. The difference was about 200 yards.
Calvin Johnson had his best year with Matt Stafford as qb, but he also had great years without him.
I guess I just have the view that a true fan is a positive or at least neutral fan. I don't buy the argument that the negavols are that way because they love UT soooo much and that is why they are expressing their displeasures. Some people don't like to argue so they announce that they are ignoring someone as their passive aggressive way of voicing their displeasure.I appreciate the not putting me on ignore. I just believe in the right to speak one's mind whether I agree or not. If one wants to ignore someone, that's their perrogative and fine. I just find it unnecessary to announce it. That just calls more attention to that postet. I think posivols, sunshine pumpers, Doolyites whatever one wants to call them have the right to express their views as well. I feel that's pretty consistent.
Right here
Stats don't lie. Look at the totals from when Simms was qb and then compare it to when Bray is qb.
LSU- Poole 19 carries for 70 yards
Lane 6 for 43
UGA- Poole 7 carries for 7 yards
Lane 7 carries for 8 yards
Why did we have our best rushing game against the best d in the nation?
JG beat me to it. Ask the 2011 Colts if the QB matters or not. I think Reggie Wayne is a pretty dang good receiver.
Stats don't lie. Look at the totals from when Simms was qb and then compare it to when Bray is qb.
LSU- Poole 19 carries for 70 yards
Lane 6 for 43
UGA- Poole 7 carries for 7 yards
Lane 7 carries for 8 yards
Why did we have our best rushing game against the best d in the nation?
I guess I just have the view that a true fan is a positive or at least neutral fan. I don't buy the argument that the negavols are that way because they love UT soooo much and that is why they are expressing their displeasures. Some people don't like to argue so they announce that they are ignoring someone as their passive aggressive way of voicing their displeasure.
I guess I just have the view that a true fan is a positive or at least neutral fan. I don't buy the argument that the negavols are that way because they love UT soooo much and that is why they are expressing their displeasures. Some people don't like to argue so they announce that they are ignoring someone as their passive aggressive way of voicing their displeasure.